24.03.2013 Views

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Family Protection and Domestic Violence Intervention Act of 1994 175<br />

arrest and reducing officer bias. 19 Training for law enforcement should emphasize<br />

the importance of utilizing all police reports, including past domestic incident<br />

reports and protective orders. Diversity training to promote communication<br />

between officers and complainants is an essential component of both effective<br />

police investigation and response.<br />

Preliminary research into the effects of the primary physical aggressor<br />

legislation on dual arrests has been encouraging. Domestic violence advocates<br />

believe that training of law enforcement on the primary physical aggressor<br />

legislation has helped reduce the rate of dual arrests. 20 Application of the primary<br />

aggressor laws were found to have a dramatic effect in Washington, where the<br />

number of arrested victims of domestic violence dropped significantly as a result<br />

of increased police training on domestic violence related issues. In 1985, “six<br />

years after the passage of must-arrest laws, Washington’s dual arrest rate — the<br />

factor used most often to determine whether victims are being wrongfully<br />

arrested — was only 1.5%.” 21 Research conducted by the New York State Office<br />

of Domestic Violence Prevention concerning dual arrests was inconclusive as it<br />

took place prior to the enactment of the primary physical aggressor legislation.<br />

Retaliatory Arrests<br />

Unfortunately, the primary physical aggressor legislation did little to deter<br />

retaliatory arrests, or “. . .exaggerated [and] false complaint[s] by an abuser<br />

usually in retaliation for measures taken by the victim to protect herself or her<br />

children.” 22 These retaliatory arrests appeared to be “partnered with potentially<br />

dangerous and manipulative batterers who are learning how to use the law to<br />

their own advantage.” 23 However, application of the primary physical aggressor<br />

analysis was found to decrease the likelihood of retaliatory arrest. 24<br />

The following recent case from a New York court illustrates the problems<br />

that occur when law enforcement personnel do not apply the primary aggressor<br />

analysis in a retaliatory arrest scenario: 25<br />

Ms. C. was a twenty-six-year-old, Spanish-speaking immigrant.<br />

She had three children ranging in age from three months to eight<br />

years of age. She separated from her spouse who became<br />

increasingly abusive after the baby was born and petitioned for<br />

an order of protection from Family <strong>Court</strong>. Several weeks later,<br />

her batterer contacted her to see the baby. When Ms. C. arrived<br />

at his home to allow him visitation, she was terrified when he

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!