24.03.2013 Views

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

230 Emily Ruben<br />

Effective November 1, 2000, the New York State Legislature eliminated a<br />

major distinction between Family <strong>Court</strong> and Supreme <strong>Court</strong> order of protection<br />

practice. It amended Domestic Relations Law §§ 240(3) and 252 to mandate<br />

that a party moving for an order of protection in Supreme <strong>Court</strong>, as in Family<br />

<strong>Court</strong>, shall be entitled to file her motion or pleading on the same day she first<br />

appears in court. Furthermore, the Supreme <strong>Court</strong>, like the Family <strong>Court</strong>, is now<br />

required to hold a hearing on the motion for a temporary order of protection on<br />

the same day or the next day that the court is in session.<br />

The duration of a temporary order of protection, which is generally granted<br />

ex parte, also differs, at least in New York City. Because of the Family <strong>Court</strong>’s<br />

overwhelming case load and the fact the Family <strong>Court</strong> judge who issues a<br />

temporary order of protection may not be the judge before whom the case will<br />

be returnable, the return date for a hearing on the order of protection petition is<br />

generally several weeks or even months in the future. If the petitioner has been<br />

granted a temporary order, this is a positive factor, and in Family <strong>Court</strong> it is<br />

likely to be granted if the allegations in the petition support a family offense.<br />

If she is denied temporary relief, the long return date may work to her detriment.<br />

In Supreme <strong>Court</strong>, the judge who signs the order to show cause and decides<br />

whether or not to grant a temporary ex parte order of protection is generally the<br />

judge who will hear the case. Supreme <strong>Court</strong> judges have greater control over<br />

their calendars and are likely to make the motion returnable within a week.<br />

A party who has been excluded from the marital residence by a Supreme <strong>Court</strong><br />

justice on an ex parte basis can expect a far more expeditious hearing than one<br />

ordered ex parte to stay away from the home of his spouse by the Family <strong>Court</strong>.<br />

Similarly, a party who has been denied temporary ex parte relief can expect her<br />

motion to be returnable in a relatively short period of time.<br />

Perhaps more significantly, the duration of a final order of protection differs<br />

in each court and the Supreme <strong>Court</strong> is the more friendly forum on this count.<br />

The duration of a final order of protection is very limited in Family <strong>Court</strong>.<br />

As of October 22, 2003, the term of a final order of protection in Family <strong>Court</strong><br />

is generally two years. The term can be extended to five years only if the conduct<br />

alleged in the petition is in violation of a valid order of protection or the court<br />

makes a finding of aggravating circumstances. 16 On the other hand, Domestic<br />

Relations Law §§ 240(3) and 252 both provide: “The order of protection may<br />

remain in effect after entry of a final matrimonial judgment and during the<br />

minority of any child whose custody or visitation is the subject of a provision<br />

of a final judgment or any order.” Thus, at least when the parties have minor<br />

children, an order of protection in Supreme <strong>Court</strong> can clearly last as long as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!