24.03.2013 Views

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

96 Jill M. Zuccardy<br />

Notes<br />

Portions of this article are modified from Lauren Shapiro and Linda Holmes,<br />

Representing Domestic Violence Victims in Neglect Proceedings, Lawyer’s<br />

<strong>Manual</strong> on Domestic Violence: Representing the Victim, eds Julie A. Domonkos<br />

and Jill Laurie Goodman (3d ed 2000) and the brief filed with the New York<br />

State <strong>Court</strong> of Appeals in Nicholson v Scoppetta, 3 NY3d 357 (2004), prepared<br />

by Jill Zuccardy, Carolyn Kubitschek and David Lansner.<br />

1. 3 NY3d 357 (2004).<br />

2. In re Lonell J., 242 AD2d 58 (1st Dept 1998).<br />

3. Matter of Tali W., 299 AD2d 413 (2d Dept 2002); In re H/R Children,<br />

302 AD2d 288 (1st Dept 2003); Matter of Dominique A., 307 AD2d 888<br />

(1st Dept 2003). But see e.g. In re Deandre T., 253 AD2d 497 (2d Dept<br />

1998); Matter of Michael G., 300 AD2d 1144 (4th Dept. 2002).<br />

4. 3 NY3d 357 (2004).<br />

5. The New York <strong>Court</strong> of Appeals chose to denominate the case Nicholson v<br />

Scoppetta while the federal court’s decisions were issued under the names<br />

Nicholson v Williams and In re Nicholson.<br />

6. 203 F Supp 2d 153 (EDNY 2002).<br />

7. In New York City, the preliminary injunction in Nicholson provided, among<br />

other things, that ACS may not remove the child from the battered mother<br />

solely or primarily because of domestic violence except under very limited<br />

circumstances. In re Nicholson, 181 F Supp 2d 182 (EDNY 2002).<br />

Although the injunction expired on December 31, 2004, ACS is bound by<br />

the principles of law underlying the injunction and an attorney who suspects<br />

that ACS has violated the law as set forth in Nicholson should contact class<br />

counsel immediately.<br />

8. E.g. Matter of Rebecca KK, 19 AD 3d 763 (3d Dept 2005); Matter of Eryck<br />

N, 17 AD 3d 723 (3d Dept 2005); Matter of Daniel GG, 17 A.D.2d 722 (3d<br />

Dept 2005); Matter of Ravern H, 15 A.D.2d 991 (4th Dept 2005). But see<br />

Matter of Paul U, 12 AD 3d 969 (3d Dept 2005) (neglect finding upheld<br />

because respondent placed child with father despite orders of protection).<br />

9. E.g. Matter of Richard T, 12 AD 3d 986 (3d Dept 2004); Matter of Karissa<br />

NN, 19 AD 3d 766 (3d Dept 2005); Matter of Michael WW, 20 AD 3d 609<br />

(3d Dept 2005).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!