29.03.2013 Views

Proceedings of the International Cyanide Detection Testing Workshop

Proceedings of the International Cyanide Detection Testing Workshop

Proceedings of the International Cyanide Detection Testing Workshop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

The <strong>International</strong> <strong>Cyanide</strong> <strong>Detection</strong> <strong>Testing</strong> <strong>Workshop</strong> (February 6-8, 2008, in Orlando,<br />

Florida) brought toge<strong>the</strong>r participants from Indonesia, <strong>the</strong> Philippines, <strong>the</strong> United States,<br />

and Vietnam, with representatives from fi sheries and law enforcement agencies, forensic<br />

laboratories, CITES Parties, non-governmental organizations, industry, and academia. The<br />

primary objective <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> workshop was to review <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong> testing methods for cyanide<br />

and identify simple, cost-effective, rapid, and internationally accepted tests to detect cyanide<br />

or its metabolites in reef fi shes at different points along <strong>the</strong> supply chain, including collection<br />

sites, export facilities, and ports <strong>of</strong> import. The workshop was organized by <strong>the</strong> United States<br />

(NOAA Coral Reef Conservation Program) with logistical support provided by SeaWeb,<br />

Kingfi sher Foundation, and <strong>the</strong> <strong>International</strong> Marinelife Alliance (IMA).<br />

The workshop opened with a series <strong>of</strong> presentations on <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> trade in live reef food<br />

fi shes (LRFF) and marine aquarium fi shes (MAF), patterns <strong>of</strong> cyanide use in <strong>the</strong>se fi sheries,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> impacts <strong>of</strong> cyanide on target and non-target species and coral reef ecosystems. A<br />

discussion followed on possible conservation, management, and enforcement strategies that<br />

have been implemented or are under consideration in <strong>the</strong> major exporting and importing<br />

countries to address <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> cyanide to capture reef fi shes.<br />

The participants noted that cyanide fi shing is a widespread practice that has been reported<br />

in at least 15 countries or island territories. The pervasive use <strong>of</strong> this poison is driven by <strong>the</strong><br />

lucrative growing and largely unregulated international trade in live reef food fi sh and <strong>the</strong><br />

marine aquarium industry. The United States is <strong>the</strong> number-one consumer <strong>of</strong> MAF, while<br />

most LRFF are destined for Hong Kong and o<strong>the</strong>r Chinese markets. Species targeted by<br />

cyanide fi shing include nearly all coral reef fi sh species, but its use appears predominant<br />

among <strong>the</strong> high-value MAF species such as surgeonfi sh, while LRFF trade frequently targets<br />

groupers and wrasses. <strong>Cyanide</strong> causes unacceptable levels <strong>of</strong> mortality <strong>of</strong> target species during<br />

collection and transport. <strong>Cyanide</strong> also causes mortality to non-target fi shes and invertebrates<br />

including corals, and is associated with reef degradation as divers break apart coral to extract<br />

stunned fi shes.<br />

Potential methods for cyanide detection were reviewed during <strong>the</strong> workshop, focusing on <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

applicability to marine fi sh testing, including colorimetric methods, enzyme-based biosensors,<br />

cyanide-ion selective electrodes (ISE), and biomarker approaches. The <strong>International</strong> Marinelife<br />

Alliance (IMA) created six CDT laboratories and tested over 48,000 specimens under contract<br />

to <strong>the</strong> Philippine Bureau <strong>of</strong> Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) from 1993 to 2001.<br />

BFAR has continued to conduct cyanide testing using <strong>the</strong> ISE method on a more limited scale<br />

since 2001. <strong>Cyanide</strong> testing by <strong>the</strong> IMA for BFAR, in combination with o<strong>the</strong>r initiatives, led to<br />

a sharp reduction in fi sh testing positive for cyanide over <strong>the</strong> period 1996 to 1999.<br />

However, at present only one <strong>Cyanide</strong> <strong>Detection</strong> <strong>Testing</strong> (CDT) laboratory remains operational<br />

full-time due to funding shortfalls and o<strong>the</strong>r issues, and cyanide use has subsequently increased.<br />

<strong>Testing</strong> done by <strong>the</strong> Puerto Princesa, Palawan laboratory found that 49% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fi sh specimens<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!