07.04.2013 Views

CRABS (BRACHYURA) OF THE GULF OF MEXICO

CRABS (BRACHYURA) OF THE GULF OF MEXICO

CRABS (BRACHYURA) OF THE GULF OF MEXICO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Freshwater Crabs<br />

Crabs of the Gulf of Mexico 87<br />

The familial name, based on the genus Potamon Savigny, 1816, was corrected<br />

from the original Potamonidae of Ortmann by an ICZN decision (Opinion 712,<br />

p. 342, in 1964). A revision of the freshwater crabs by Bott (1955b) split this<br />

family into two: the Pseudothelphusidae and the Trichodactylidae. Various<br />

other schemes for classification have been proposed (Pretzmann, 1965; Bott,<br />

1968; Smalley, 1970). Gulf region species are confined to northern Cuba and<br />

southern Mexico, but insufficient material and information is available for most<br />

species to yield accurate ranges or to present a satisfactory organization of taxonomic<br />

relationships. Because these crabs are inhabitants of rivers, lakes, and<br />

caves, species ranges tend to be restricted to small areas; several are known only<br />

from a single type specimen. Species occurring in the center of a land mass,<br />

such as Potamocarcinus (Typhlopseudothelphusa) mocinoi in caves near Comitan<br />

(Chiapas) Mexico (Rioja, 1952) could be assigned to a coastal region based<br />

on watershed drainage patterns. The Cuban species listed by Chace and Hobbs<br />

(1969) are not localized to either the Gulf or the Caribbean side of the island<br />

in the records cited. For these reasons, these crabs are not included in the present<br />

work. Further references, including some older systematic papers, can be found<br />

in the papers cited above. There exists a clear need for more extensive work on<br />

this group of brachyurans.<br />

Family XANTHIDAE Dana, 1851<br />

This is a large family of crabs (about 1000 species and more than 130 genera)<br />

that has traditionally posed a number of taxonomic problems. Many of the<br />

species are small in size and appear morphologicallj^ similar. Individual variability<br />

and the large number of closely related species has often made definitive<br />

identification difficult, so that earlier collection records must be used cautiously.<br />

Rathbun (1930) did not subdivide her account of the xanthids into subfamilies.<br />

Guinot (1971) offers a number of systematic revisions and she comments<br />

at some length on affinities, but she also avoids listing the 51 genera that she<br />

treats under subfamilies. The same procedure is followed here, by arrangement<br />

of the 33 Gulf genera in alphabetical order, without regard for proposed affinity<br />

within the family. The xanthids are currently being revised by various workers<br />

around the world, so that a better organized and more accurate representation<br />

of this family should be forthcoming.<br />

Aclaea de Haan, 1833<br />

Aclaea acantha (H. Milne Edwards, 1834) (Hist. Nat. Crust., vol. 1, p. 379)<br />

Rathbun, 1930, p. 261, pi. 105, fig. 5, pi. 106, figs. 1-2; Rathbun, 1933, p. 57.<br />

Range: Bahamas; Florida Keys and Dry Tortugas; northwest coast of Cuba;<br />

Jamaica; Haiti; Puerto Rico; Guadeloupe; St. Bartholomew; Fernando de Noronha,<br />

Brazil.<br />

Depth: surface to 22 m (tol2fm).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!