10.04.2013 Views

Tracing the Source of the Elephant And Hippopotamus Ivory from ...

Tracing the Source of the Elephant And Hippopotamus Ivory from ...

Tracing the Source of the Elephant And Hippopotamus Ivory from ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Minoan and Mycenaean sherds <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> 14 th /13 th centuries in Late Bronze Age contexts.<br />

There is also evidence for copper smelting and trade in ostrich eggs (Vagnetti and Lo<br />

Schiavo 1989: 217; Luce 1998). The site has been reconstructed as a trade entropot<br />

inhabited during <strong>the</strong> 14 th -12 th centuries B.C., although Hayward (1990: 105) suggests <strong>the</strong><br />

site “does not seem to have had any real connection with New Kingdom Egypt- until <strong>the</strong><br />

time when a fortress was built at Zawiyat Umm ar Rakham, about 20 km to <strong>the</strong> west<br />

during <strong>the</strong> reign <strong>of</strong> Ramesses II (c. 1279-1213 BC).” Hayward fur<strong>the</strong>r cites one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

obelisks erected by Hatshepsut at Karnak, which bears <strong>the</strong> inscription: “I brought <strong>the</strong><br />

goods <strong>of</strong> Tjehenu (Eastern Libya/Western Egypt), consisting <strong>of</strong> 700 ivory tusks (which)<br />

were <strong>the</strong>re...numerous pan<strong>the</strong>r skins (measuring) 5 cubits along <strong>the</strong> back (and) belonging<br />

to <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn pan<strong>the</strong>r, beside all <strong>the</strong> (o<strong>the</strong>r) goods <strong>of</strong> this country.” Hayward (1990:<br />

107) <strong>the</strong>n proceeds to suggest <strong>the</strong> tusks “must have originated fur<strong>the</strong>r to <strong>the</strong> west, in<br />

North Western Libya... or, just possibly, south <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sahara.” How <strong>the</strong> tusks must have<br />

originated to <strong>the</strong> west when <strong>the</strong> pan<strong>the</strong>r skins in <strong>the</strong> same inscription originated <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

south seems questionable. Both <strong>the</strong> ivory and <strong>the</strong> pan<strong>the</strong>r skins could have been traded<br />

northward <strong>from</strong> south <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sahara, as Hayward suggests, but <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> inferred “o<strong>the</strong>r” in<br />

“o<strong>the</strong>r goods <strong>of</strong> this country” should be removed <strong>from</strong> her translation. Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong><br />

inscription is a tantalizing and exceptional piece <strong>of</strong> evidence for Late Bronze Age trade <strong>of</strong><br />

elephant ivory in Egypt.<br />

The Possibility, and Degree, <strong>of</strong> Contact Between <strong>the</strong> Aegean and North Africa<br />

Bass (1997) entertains <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Aegean ivory as coming<br />

<strong>from</strong> North Africa, noting that ships may have stopped at Marsa Matruh on a counter-<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!