Annual Report - Palestinian Center for Human Rights
Annual Report - Palestinian Center for Human Rights
Annual Report - Palestinian Center for Human Rights
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Ef<strong>for</strong>ts to Prosecute Israeli War Criminals be<strong>for</strong>e the International<br />
Judiciary<br />
Denial of justice <strong>for</strong> <strong>Palestinian</strong> civilians is deeply rooted in the Israeli judicial system<br />
in general, and the military judiciary in particular. Through it long experience, PCHR<br />
has concluded that the Israeli judiciary is used to provide legal cover <strong>for</strong> IOF to<br />
commit war crimes against <strong>Palestinian</strong> civilians, and that it is a means used to avoid<br />
resorting to international justice directly under the pretext of the existence of a just<br />
Israeli national judiciary.<br />
In light of these facts, and following the exhaustion of national legal means (in this<br />
case the Israeli ones), PCHR, in cooperation with a number of international legal and<br />
human rights organizations, has resorted to international legal means to prosecute<br />
Israeli war criminals. On 8 December 2005, the <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> Constitutional <strong>Rights</strong> and<br />
PCHR brought a class action lawsuit be<strong>for</strong>e the US Judiciary in New York against<br />
Avi Dichter, the <strong>for</strong>mer Director of Israel’s General Security Service (GSS), on behalf<br />
of the <strong>Palestinian</strong>s who were killed or injured in a 2002 air strike in Gaza. The attack<br />
occurred just be<strong>for</strong>e midnight on July 22, 2002, when IOF dropped a one-ton bomb<br />
on al-Daraj, a residential neighborhood in Gaza City in the Occupied <strong>Palestinian</strong><br />
Territory. The attack killed seven adults and eight children. In September 2005,<br />
PCHR, acting <strong>for</strong> victims in Gaza, built a file of evidence with the help of Hickman &<br />
Rose Solicitors to pursue a case against Major General Doron Almog (retired) in the<br />
UK <strong>for</strong> grave breaches of the Fourth Geneva Convention while he was GOC Southern<br />
Commander. On 10 September 2005, the Chief London Magistrate Timothy<br />
Workman issued a warrant to arrest Almog on suspicion of committing a grave breach<br />
of the Fourth Geneva Convention 1949 (which is a criminal offence in the UK under<br />
the Geneva Conventions Act 1957). The alleged offence was committed as part of<br />
Israel’s belligerent occupation of the Occupied <strong>Palestinian</strong> Territory. On 11<br />
September 2005, Almog spent some time ‘airside’ at Heathrow airport be<strong>for</strong>e taking a<br />
return flight to Israel. He had learned that he was facing arrest by British police<br />
PCHR believes that a number of leaks occurred, which allowed Doron Almog to<br />
evade arrest and return to Israel hours after he had landed in the UK, and asserts that it<br />
will continue its ef<strong>for</strong>ts to prosecute Israeli war criminals be<strong>for</strong>e the international<br />
justice. PCHR calls upon all international and regional human rights organizations to<br />
support these ef<strong>for</strong>ts. PCHR followed up with the utmost concern media reports that<br />
Israel pressured <strong>for</strong> amendment of the British laws in order to avoid the prosecution of<br />
Israeli war criminals be<strong>for</strong>e the UK judiciary. 38 PCHR calls upon the UK and all<br />
High Contracting Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention not to surrender to the<br />
Israeli pressure and to fulfil their legal and moral obligations under the Convention to<br />
prosecute all those who are responsible <strong>for</strong> war crimes.<br />
38 In November 2005, the Israeli daily Yediot Aharanot reported that a number of secret meetings were<br />
held between a senior Israeli diplomatic and judicial delegation and officials of the British government<br />
in London to abolish the arrests warrants issued against Israeli war criminals and amend the British law<br />
related to issuing arrest warrants against war criminals. The newspaper asserted, according to senior<br />
British sources, that the British Government intended to surrender to the Israeli pressure and amend<br />
relevant British laws.<br />
52