Annual Report - Palestinian Center for Human Rights
Annual Report - Palestinian Center for Human Rights
Annual Report - Palestinian Center for Human Rights
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Weak Per<strong>for</strong>mance of the Legislature and Continued Functioning of<br />
PLC Members without Electoral Mandate<br />
The PLC continued to function throughout 2005, under difficult conditions resulting<br />
from the policy of collective punishment, imposed by IOF against the <strong>Palestinian</strong><br />
people and their institutions. This policy includes closure and internal restrictions on<br />
the movement of PLC members between the Gaza Strip and West Bank, and<br />
prevention of West Bank PLC members from reaching the PLC in Ramallah. This is<br />
a direct result of Israeli policies to cut off the West Bank and trans<strong>for</strong>m it into isolated<br />
Bantustans. The PLC could not hold its sessions regularly and was <strong>for</strong>ced to function<br />
using “video conference” technology in order to overcome movement restrictions. In<br />
addition, PLC committees held separate sessions in the Gaza Strip and West Bank.<br />
Despite registering some per<strong>for</strong>mance improvement in comparison to previous years,<br />
the overall PLC per<strong>for</strong>mance was disappointing, especially in the areas of legislation<br />
and monitoring. The key failures and deficiencies in the PLC per<strong>for</strong>mance were:<br />
- The end of the legal term of the PLC since 1999, which necessitates holding<br />
new parliamentary elections to renew the PLC's legitimacy.<br />
- The prolonged vacancy of 4 PLC seats, which had become free as a result of<br />
resignation and death. There was no serious ef<strong>for</strong>t to fill these vacancies, as is<br />
required under the law.<br />
- Dual responsibility of PLC members. A number of PLC members held paid<br />
executive functions, in clear violation of Law #10 of 2004 on the duties and<br />
rights of PLC members. This law states that, other than the post of Cabinet<br />
Minister, “A (PLC) member cannot be a member in any consultant,<br />
supervision, or administrative council in any governmental institution.”<br />
- Absenteeism by PLC members from sessions and the act of leaving sessions<br />
shortly after convening. A number of laws were passed and important<br />
decisions taken with a limited number of members in attendance. This<br />
included a 20-member session which passed the 2005 budget law, approving<br />
the report of the Budget, Monitoring, and Legal Committees on the smuggling<br />
of Egyptian cement to the Israeli market. The recommendations of the<br />
Parliamentary Committee, <strong>for</strong>med on 14 July 2004, on monitoring the political<br />
and field situation in the Gaza Strip, were passed with only 37 PLC members<br />
in attendance.<br />
- Prioritization of personal interests and considerations during the legislative<br />
process.<br />
On 11 December 2005, PCHR issued its 8 th report on 'Monitoring the Per<strong>for</strong>mance of<br />
the PLC'. It included an evaluation of the PLC per<strong>for</strong>mance with regard to its<br />
legislative, monitoring and accountability functions during its session from 11 March<br />
2004 to 9 March 2005. The report pointed to the deficiencies mentioned above. In<br />
addition, the report included a number of recommendations to develop the work of the<br />
PLC, such as:<br />
- PNA adherence to the scheduled date <strong>for</strong> legislative elections, 25 January<br />
2005, in order to elect new representatives of the <strong>Palestinian</strong> people and to reestablish<br />
confidence in the Council that was <strong>for</strong>med more than 9 years ago,<br />
and which has since lost its legitimacy and legal mandate.<br />
71