Chapter 1 - Caltrans - State of California
Chapter 1 - Caltrans - State of California
Chapter 1 - Caltrans - State of California
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Chapter</strong> 3 Comments and Coordination<br />
B land uses within the project limits under consideration include residential properties. It<br />
was predicted that the future carpool lane project along U.S. 101 would impact many <strong>of</strong><br />
the residential areas adjacent to the freeway within the project limits. Proposed soundwall<br />
locations are shown in Appendix F.<br />
Residential Areas<br />
All impacted residential areas have been considered for noise abatement. They are<br />
represented by Sites #A1 thru #A5 in Mussel Shoals, Sites #B thru #B4 in La Conchita,<br />
and Sites #D, D1, D2, D5, and D6 in the City <strong>of</strong> Carpinteria.<br />
Hotels/Motels<br />
The Cliffhouse Inn located in Mussel Shoals is represented by field reading Site #A1.<br />
Parks<br />
There is one park/recreational area located at Bailard Avenue within the project limits.<br />
No traffic noise impacts at the future predicted noise level <strong>of</strong> 66 dBA-Leq (h) or above<br />
has been predicted at this park. Based on predicted noise levels, freeway traffic noise<br />
impact has not been predicted to occur at the park located on the southwest corner <strong>of</strong> U.S.<br />
101 and Bailard Avenue.<br />
Commercial Developments<br />
There are no commercial developments with exterior frequent human use.<br />
Undeveloped Lands<br />
There are two undeveloped land parcels that will be developed in the future. At 6380 Via<br />
Real, 37 single-family units have been proposed for construction. At the “Bluffs 3”, King<br />
Resorts with 213 hotel rooms has been proposed for construction.<br />
The residential areas <strong>of</strong> Mussel Shoals, La Conchita, and the City <strong>of</strong> Carpinteria qualified<br />
for noise abatement consideration as part <strong>of</strong> a Type I project. Therefore, various heights<br />
<strong>of</strong> acoustically feasible soundwalls have been provided as noise abatement measure for<br />
both BUILD alternatives. Proposed soundwalls SW 101 and SW 102 in Mussel Shoals<br />
benefit approximately 43 residences; SW 103 and SW 104 in La Conchita benefit 44<br />
residences. In the City <strong>of</strong> Carpinteria, proposed soundwalls SW 105, SW 106, SW 107,<br />
SW 108 provide noise reduction to 31 and 18 residences.<br />
Proposed Acoustically Feasible Soundwalls For BUILD Alternatives:<br />
In the community <strong>of</strong> Mussel Shoals, a minimum <strong>of</strong> two 10-foot tall soundwalls were<br />
determined to provide at least a 5 dBA noise reduction for the areas represented by sites<br />
A-1 through A-5 (43 residences in Mussel Shoals) (see Table 2.2-10 and Appendix F).<br />
IS/EA VEN-SB US101 HOV Project 171