Chapter 1 - Caltrans - State of California

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Potentially significant impact Less than significant impact with mitigation Appendix A CEQA Checklist Less than significant impact No Impacts The proposed project would not conflict with any applicable land use plans, policies or regulations of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (please refer to the Land Use Section of the IS/EA for a full analysis). The proposed project would require local coastal permits from Ventura and Santa Barbara Counties and the City of Carpinteria prior to project construction. b) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? The proposed project would not conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans. No impacts would be anticipated. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? The proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of known mineral resources. No impacts would be anticipated. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? The proposed project would not 11. NOISE - Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? The proposed project noise levels would warrant sound attenuation. The proposed project features identify soundwalls for communities along Via Real north of the Bailard Avenue Interchange, La Conchita, and Mussel Shoals. The soundwalls would reduce sound levels per Department protocol. Please refer to the Noise Section of the IS/EA for a more detailed analysis. b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Please refer to section a) above and the Noise Section of the IS/EA. c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Please refer to section a) above and the Noise Section of the IS/EA. d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Please refer to section a) above and the Noise Section of the IS/EA. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? The proposed project is not located within two miles of a public airstrip, no impacts are anticipated. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 232 IS/EA VEN-SB US101 HOV Project X X X X X X X X X
Please refer to section e) 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Potentially significant impact Less than significant impact with mitigation Appendix A CEQA Checklist Less than significant impact No Impacts The proposed project is upgrading an existing facility to improve the level of service through the U.S. 101 regional corridor. The proposed project would not construct a new road or extension of a road to indirectly induce population growth in the surrounding areas. No impacts are anticipated. b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No houses will be displaced by the proposed project. No impacts are anticipated. c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No people would be displaced due to the proposed project. No impacts are anticipated. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES - Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? X The proposed project would not increase the demand or create new demand on fire protection services. No impacts anticipated. b) Police protection? X The proposed project would not increase the demand or create new demand on police protection services. No impacts anticipated. c) Schools? X The proposed project would not increase the demand or create new demand on school services. No impacts anticipated. d) Parks? X The proposed project would not increase the demand or create new demand on parks services. No impacts anticipated. Other public facilities? X The proposed project would not increase the demand or create new demand on other public facilities services. No impacts anticipated. 14. RECREATION - a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? The proposed project would not increase the demand or create new demand on regional parks services. No impacts anticipated. IS/EA VEN-SB US101 HOV Project 233 X X X X
Page 1 and 2:
VENTURA / SANTA BARBARA 101 HOV PRO
Page 4 and 5:
VEN-SB US101 HOV Project IS/EA ❖
Page 6 and 7:
❖ iv VEN-SB US101 HOV Project IS/
Page 9 and 10:
List of Figures List of Figures Fig
Page 11 and 12:
Chapter 1Proposed Project 1.1 Intro
Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 1 Proposed Project Backgrou
Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 1 Proposed Project between
Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1 Proposed Project on a bas
Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1 Proposed Project For Vent
Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 1 Proposed Project South Co
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 1 Proposed Project • Inst
Page 25 and 26:
Source: The Department 2008 Chapter
Page 27 and 28:
Chapter 1 Proposed Project 1.2.7 Pe
Page 29 and 30:
Chapter 2 Affected Environment, Env
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
IS/EA VEN-SB US101 HOV Project 23 C
Page 35 and 36:
IS/EA VEN-SB US101 HOV Project 25 C
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
2.1.6 Farmlands Chapter 2 Affected
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Total Population Race White Black o
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Housing Units Owner Occupied Renter
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Chapter 3 Comments and Coordination
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Bikeway Chapter 3 Comments and Coor
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
• Provide hardscape decorative de
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
To comply, the following must be an
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
• Soil stabilization Practices
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
2.2.6 Air Quality Chapter 3 Comment
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Receiver Site #A Site #A1 Site #A2
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192: Chapter 3 Comments and Coordination
Page 197 and 198: Table 2.4-1 Cumulative Projects and
Page 213 and 214: Chapter 4 List of Preparers Chapter
Page 215 and 216: Chapter 5 Distribution List Elected
Page 217 and 218: California Native Plant Society 909
Page 219 and 220: Community Based Organizations Ventu
Page 221 and 222: Richard Zavala Rincon Island/ Greka
Page 223 and 224: Evan E Skei Resident 6770 Ojai Ave.
Page 225 and 226: Mary C & James Cox Resident 7062 Ox
Page 227 and 228: Virginia Cotsis Resident 6820 Santa
Page 229 and 230: Doug and Jaleh White 8128 Puesta De
Page 231 and 232: Harry Van Wingerden 3902 Via Real C
Page 233 and 234: Thomas J. McGillis, M.D. 5206 Beckf
Page 235 and 236: Appendix A CEQA Checklist Appendix
Page 237 and 238: ) Violate any air quality standard
Page 239 and 240: Potentially significant impact Less
Page 241: Potentially significant impact Less
Page 245 and 246: Potentially significant impact Less
Page 247 and 248: Appendix B Traffic Flow Charts Exis
Page 249 and 250: 2015 Build Appendix B Traffic Flow
Page 251 and 252: 2035 Build Appendix B Traffic Flow
Page 253 and 254: Appendix C Title VI Policy Statemen
Page 255 and 256: Appendix D Glossary and Abbreviated
Page 257 and 258: Appendix E Minimization and/or Miti
Page 259 and 260: Impact Avoidance or Minimization Me
Page 269 and 270: Appendix F Noise Aerial Maps and Ta
Page 271 and 272: 20-Minute Noise Measurement Locatio
Page 275 and 276: IS/EA VEN-SB US101 HOV Project 265
Page 281 and 282: Table B Predicted Noise Reduction F
Page 283 and 284: Appendix G Letter to the State Hist
Page 285: IS/EA VEN-SB US101 HOV Project 275
show all

Chapter 1 - Caltrans - State of California

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?