19.05.2013 Views

Chapter 1 - Caltrans - State of California

Chapter 1 - Caltrans - State of California

Chapter 1 - Caltrans - State of California

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Chapter</strong> 3 Comments and Coordination<br />

The proposed barriers would be constructed along the shoulder <strong>of</strong> the highway. Proposed<br />

Soundwall #101 would partially obstruct the view <strong>of</strong> the Cliff House Inn from the U.S.<br />

101. Therefore, the views <strong>of</strong> the affected property owners (i.e. the owners <strong>of</strong> impacted<br />

residences represented by Site #A1 and commercial property owner) must be considered<br />

before making a final noise abatement decision. Community members have expressed<br />

the desire for SW101; however, every effort would be made to improve visibility <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Cliff House Inn from the U.S.101.<br />

Table 2.2-10 Proposed Soundwalls for BUILD Alternatives (Mussel Shoals)<br />

Mussel Shoals<br />

Receptor # and Location<br />

Predicted 2036<br />

worst hour Noise<br />

Level<br />

dBA Leq(h)<br />

Soundwall<br />

Number(s)<br />

Predicted<br />

2036 Noise<br />

level with 10-<br />

foot<br />

soundwall<br />

dBA Leq(h)<br />

Predicted 2036<br />

Noise<br />

Reduction<br />

(minimum 5- dBA<br />

Leq(h))<br />

A1-6614 Old PCH 67 101+102 65 -<br />

A2- 6666 Old PCH 67 101 + 102 61 6<br />

A3 – 6292 Ocean Ave 66 102 60 6<br />

A-4 6762 Breakers Way 67 102 61 6<br />

A-5 6776 Breakers Way 67 102 62 5<br />

The Department’s Noise Study Report 12/24/07 Table 4<br />

In La Conchita, a minimum <strong>of</strong> two 12-foot tall soundwalls built along the edge <strong>of</strong> the<br />

shoulder were determined to provide at least a 5 dBA reduction in noise for the areas<br />

represented by B-B4 (44 residences in La Conchita) (see Table 2.2-11 or Appendix F).<br />

These proposed soundwalls would block the residents’ view <strong>of</strong> the Pacific Ocean.<br />

Community members have expressed they would not want the soundwall constructed.<br />

Table 2.2-11 Proposed Soundwalls for BUILD Alternatives (La Conchita)<br />

La Conchita<br />

Receptor # and Location<br />

Predicted 2030<br />

worst hour Noise<br />

Level<br />

dBA Leq(h)<br />

Soundwall<br />

Number(s)<br />

Predicted sound<br />

level12 foot<br />

Soundwall<br />

dBA Leq(h)<br />

Predicted Noise<br />

Reduction<br />

(minimum 5- dBA<br />

Leq(h))<br />

B - 6726 Ojai Avenue 70 103+104 63 7<br />

BM1 – Modeled site 67 103+104 61 6<br />

B1- 6832 Zelzah Ave 70 103+104 65 5<br />

B2 – 6953 W. Surfside Street 72 104 64 8<br />

B3 – 7003 w. Surfside Street 69 104 62 7<br />

B4 – 7128 Carpinteria Avenue 68 104 62 6<br />

The Department’s Noise Study Report 12/24/07 Table 4<br />

In Carpinteria, a minimum <strong>of</strong> four 12-foot tall soundwalls (two along the edge <strong>of</strong><br />

shoulder and two along state right-<strong>of</strong>-way) have been proposed to provide at least a 5<br />

dBA reduction in noise for the areas represented by D to D6 (see Table 2.2-12 or<br />

Appendix F). Community members along Via Real have expressed their opinion that the<br />

172 IS/EA VEN-SB US101 HOV Project

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!