19.05.2013 Views

Chapter 1 - Caltrans - State of California

Chapter 1 - Caltrans - State of California

Chapter 1 - Caltrans - State of California

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Chapter</strong> 3 Comments and Coordination<br />

wait time to turn onto U.S. 101 through the median openings would be for the NO<br />

BUILD alternative. Closing the median openings would also prevent drivers from<br />

making unsafe maneuvers resulting from frustration with long wait times. No cumulative<br />

impacts are anticipated to result from these closures.<br />

The project also includes an option for modification <strong>of</strong> the existing southbound bikeway<br />

and construction <strong>of</strong> a northbound 2 directional Class I Bicycle facility. Upgrades to the<br />

bicycle facility are identified as beneficial impacts and would facilitate movement <strong>of</strong><br />

cyclists through the corridor. Construction <strong>of</strong> a pedestrian under-crossing at La Conchita<br />

would improve beach access for the community. These improvements would result in an<br />

overall beneficial impact to the local and regional bikeway and pedestrian facilities;<br />

therefore, cumulative contributions would be considered less than cumulatively<br />

considerable.<br />

Avoidance, Minimization and/or Mitigation Measures<br />

With implementation <strong>of</strong> standard minimization measures and mitigation measures<br />

proposed in this IS/EA, project contributions to cumulative impacts would be considered<br />

less than cumulatively considerable, and no additional mitigation measures are required.<br />

2.5 Climate Change (CEQA)<br />

Regulatory Setting<br />

While climate change has been a concern since at least 1988 as evidenced by the<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> the United Nations and World Meteorological Organization’s<br />

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the efforts devoted to greenhouse gas<br />

emissions reduction and climate change research and policy have increased dramatically<br />

in recent years. In 2002, with the passage <strong>of</strong> Assembly Bill 1493, <strong>California</strong> launched an<br />

innovative and proactive approach to dealing with greenhouse gas emissions and climate<br />

change at the state level. Assembly Bill 1493 requires the Air Resources Board to<br />

develop and implement regulations to reduce automobile and light truck greenhouse gas<br />

emissions; these regulations will apply to automobiles and light trucks beginning with the<br />

2009 model year. Greenhouse gases related to human activity include carbon dioxide,<br />

methane, nitrous oxide, tetrafluoromethane, hexafluoroethane, sulfur hexafluoride, HFC-<br />

23 (fluor<strong>of</strong>orm), HFC-134a (1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane), and HFC-152a (difluoroethane).<br />

On June 1, 2005, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed Executive Order S-3-05. The<br />

goal <strong>of</strong> this executive order is to reduce <strong>California</strong>’s greenhouse gas emissions to: 1)<br />

2000 levels by 2010, 2) 1990 levels by the 2020, and 3) 80 percent below the 1990 levels<br />

by the year 2050. In 2006, this goal was further reinforced with the passage <strong>of</strong> Assembly<br />

190 IS/EA VEN-SB US101 HOV Project

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!