22.05.2013 Views

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

132 MONETARY ECONOMICS<br />

explaining the apparent instability. Most researchers have attempted to<br />

show in one way or another that the problems were, indeed, only apparent<br />

<strong>and</strong> did not seriously undermine the conventional theory of the dem<strong>and</strong> for<br />

money. The principal areas of endeavour have been in improving the<br />

econometric techniques used <strong>and</strong> in studying financial innovation <strong>and</strong> <strong>its</strong><br />

effects on the dem<strong>and</strong> for money. As well, the buffer stock theory of the<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> for money was developed to show how some of the empirical findings<br />

could be explained within the framework of neoclassical theory. In<br />

section 6.5, we look at views sceptical about the notion of a stable dem<strong>and</strong><br />

for money.<br />

6.2 Problems in testing the dem<strong>and</strong> for money<br />

We suggest in Section 4.4 that if money is endogenous, the dem<strong>and</strong> for<br />

money might not be very important. However, since much of past <strong>monetary</strong><br />

<strong>economics</strong> has assumed an exogenous money supply, the dem<strong>and</strong> for<br />

money has seemed central to many of the debates on the value of <strong>monetary</strong><br />

<strong>policy</strong>. 1 Consequently, we sufficiently felt the need to conform to past<br />

views to spend Chapter 5 looking in some detail at the theory of the dem<strong>and</strong><br />

for money, only to find that it raised a number of questions but did not provide<br />

answers. In particular, the theories differed over two issues that would<br />

be crucial if the supply of money were exogenous:<br />

1. The extent to which the dem<strong>and</strong> for money is sensitive to changes in<br />

the rate of interest; <strong>and</strong><br />

2. whether the dem<strong>and</strong> for money function is likely to be stable.<br />

The only possible way of resolving these issues appeared to be through testing.<br />

A logical starting point for this is to derive from that theory the independent<br />

variables we wish to include in the equation to be tested. Based on<br />

our discussion in Chapter 5, this might give us a list something like the following:<br />

• The interest rate on representative non-money assets, possibly<br />

including the rate of inflation<br />

• The interest rate on money<br />

• The transfer costs of switching between money <strong>and</strong> non-money assets<br />

• The level of current income or wealth/permanent income<br />

• The variance of income

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!