22.05.2013 Views

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DEFINITIONS OF MONEY IN ECONOMICS 29<br />

changes in P tT (this is the <strong>basis</strong> of the Quantity Theory of Money which we<br />

meet again in Section 4.2).<br />

We can think of the task of the <strong>monetary</strong> authorities in measuring <strong>and</strong><br />

attempting to control the money supply in one of three ways:<br />

• they could attempt to distinguish between those depos<strong>its</strong> that are held<br />

only to allow exchange to take place <strong>and</strong> depos<strong>its</strong> held for savings purposes;<br />

• they could attempt to identify a set of assets, changes in the quantity of<br />

which would, in the absence of shocks to Vt, induce predictable changes<br />

in PtT. • they could attempt to identify a set of assets, the size of which is<br />

unrelated to V t.<br />

A common approach to distinguishing between depos<strong>its</strong> held to allow<br />

exchange to occur <strong>and</strong> savings depos<strong>its</strong> was to limit the definition of<br />

‘money’ to non-interest-bearing depos<strong>its</strong>, on the grounds that people would<br />

only willingly forgo interest on those depos<strong>its</strong> that they required to carry out<br />

their planned transactions.<br />

We need to acknowledge at this point a potential problem with the use of<br />

T (total transactions). When Irving Fisher published his well-known statement<br />

of the Quantity Theory of Money (Fisher, 1911), he distinguished<br />

between those transactions related to national income (Y) <strong>and</strong> those related<br />

to financial transactions (F). Thus:<br />

MV = P yY + P f F ...2.2<br />

where Y <strong>and</strong> F are income <strong>and</strong> financial transactions respectively. Yet,<br />

when economists today refer to velocity, they are almost always referring to<br />

income velocity, that is to say GDP/M, or PY/M rather than PT/M.<br />

Furthermore, income velocity is reported in official statistics. Although a<br />

number of other reasons have been put forward, perhaps the principal explanation<br />

of this is that a measure of total transactions in the economy is not<br />

readily available.<br />

Pause for thought 2.1:<br />

Why is it so difficult to measure the value of all transactions in an economy,<br />

including financial transactions <strong>and</strong> the exchange of second-h<strong>and</strong> goods? Can<br />

you think of ways in which you might try to obtain such a measure?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!