22.05.2013 Views

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Pause for thought 7.8:<br />

THE TRANSMISSION MECHANISM OF MONETARY POLICY 189<br />

Compare the notion of the net wealth of the private sector with Friedman's version<br />

of wealth in Section 5.8. Why does no one include human wealth in the net wealth<br />

of the private sector?<br />

In considering whether there is a wealth effect, we must first look at the<br />

notion of wealth being used here. It is usual to refer to the net wealth of the<br />

private sector. We divide the economy into three sectors: the private, the<br />

public sector, <strong>and</strong> the foreign. The net wealth of the private sector is defined<br />

to include all private sector assets that are not also liabilities of other members<br />

of the sector—that is, it includes private sector assets for which the corresponding<br />

liabilities are those of the public sector or the foreign sector.<br />

Thus, many financial assets are excluded because they create corresponding<br />

liabilities within the private sector. For example, equities are assets to<br />

shareholders but are liabilities of firms within the sector. If we rule such<br />

assets out, we are left with four categories of asset to investigate:<br />

• real assets;<br />

• assets that are liabilities of the foreign sector;<br />

• inside money; <strong>and</strong><br />

• assets that are liabilities of the public sector.<br />

The first two are straightforward. Both real assets held by the private<br />

sector <strong>and</strong> private sector assets that are liabilities of the foreign sector are<br />

clearly part of private sector net wealth. However, there are measurement<br />

problems. There are severe difficulties in measuring the net value of the<br />

stocks of private sector housing <strong>and</strong> consumer durables. Thus, in most studies,<br />

only the capital stock of firms is included as part of private sector net<br />

wealth. The value of foreign assets can alter rapidly with changes in<br />

exchange rates.<br />

Inside money, remember, consists of bank depos<strong>its</strong>, which are assets to<br />

the holders of the depos<strong>its</strong> but are liabilities to the banks with which they<br />

are held. Since banks are part of the private sector, some attempts have been<br />

made to exclude inside money from the definition of private sector net<br />

wealth. This, however, ignores the fact that the whole <strong>monetary</strong> system is<br />

based upon the presumption that banks do not have to repay depos<strong>its</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

need only hold small prudential balances to meet the day-to-day calls upon<br />

them. If we add central bank willingness to act as lender of last resort to<br />

ensure that the system does not fail, it seems reasonable to accept inside<br />

money as a part of private sector net wealth.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!