22.05.2013 Views

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• The expected change in the rate of interest<br />

• An index of prices.<br />

TESTING THE DEMAND FOR MONEY 133<br />

Unfortunately, we can immediately see several practical difficulties<br />

associated with testing any equation derived from this list. These are summarized<br />

in Box 6.1. We consider each of them below. However, we must<br />

first mention a more general problem. Where we are required to make<br />

choices regarding the form of the variables to be included in the testing<br />

equation (for example, among different definitions of money), we shall see<br />

that theory provides little or no help. This usually results in the choice being<br />

made on pragmatic grounds — which form of the variable ‘tests better’.<br />

But what does this mean? It means that we do not ask whether the dem<strong>and</strong><br />

for money is stable. Rather we ask how we can construct a dem<strong>and</strong> for<br />

money function that appears to be stable over a particular period. The presumption<br />

of almost all of the thous<strong>and</strong>s of tests that have been conducted<br />

over the past half-century has been that the dem<strong>and</strong> for money is stable.<br />

Equations that don’t produce the right result are discarded. The proposition<br />

can never be disproved because there are always changes that can be made<br />

to the equation being tested or new tests to be conducted. It is a rigged<br />

game. Still, let us do as we promised <strong>and</strong> look at each of the difficulties separately.<br />

Box 6.1: Problems in the testing of the dem<strong>and</strong> for money<br />

(a) There is no agreed definition of money for testing purposes;<br />

(b) The dem<strong>and</strong> for money is not directly observable;<br />

(c) The assumption of an endogenous money supply creates an identification<br />

problem;<br />

(d) There are problems in the choice between income <strong>and</strong> wealth as the scale<br />

variable <strong>and</strong> difficulties in the measurement of wealth;<br />

(e) There are problems with the selection of the interest rates;<br />

(f) Variables, all of which should be included as independent variables may<br />

be correlated with each other, making it difficult to isolate the specific relationship<br />

between each variable <strong>and</strong> the dem<strong>and</strong> for money;<br />

(g) Some of the variables in our list may not be easily measured or measurable at<br />

all;<br />

(h) There are problems in the choice of time period for the testing.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!