22.05.2013 Views

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10 MONETARY ECONOMICS<br />

The only reason why this might not be possible stems from the lack of<br />

spending resources as we have defined them above. After all, a person borrowing<br />

from a bank takes it for granted that the loan will come in a form<br />

that allows him or her to spend. Thus, the lack of ‘money’ does not except<br />

for very short periods constrain individual dem<strong>and</strong> for goods <strong>and</strong> services<br />

<strong>and</strong> the microeconomic dem<strong>and</strong> for money has little economic significance.<br />

1.3 Money in the aggregate<br />

Of course, it might be argued that if I borrow money from someone else,<br />

this is part of the total stock of money currently available in the economy as<br />

a whole. Then, as long as we assume that the total supply of money is temporarily<br />

fixed, we could conceive of a situation in which the supply does not<br />

match the current dem<strong>and</strong> for money. But this introduces the important<br />

question of what determines the aggregate supply of money — is it fixed or,<br />

at least controllable by the <strong>monetary</strong> authorities, or might ‘money’ in the<br />

aggregate be created by the actions of people in the economy seeking to borrow<br />

<strong>and</strong> to spend? We look at this issue in detail in Chapters 3, 4 <strong>and</strong> 11.<br />

For the moment, let us assume that the aggregate supply of money is<br />

temporarily fixed or that it is growing at a predetermined rate. Then, an<br />

unanticipated increase in the dem<strong>and</strong> for goods <strong>and</strong> services, <strong>and</strong> the consequent<br />

increase in the dem<strong>and</strong> for money to allow the additional desired<br />

exchanges to take place, might produce a shortage of money in the aggregate.<br />

What does this mean at an individual level? Clearly, those who hold<br />

cash or bank depos<strong>its</strong> will not be immediately affected. Again, there is no<br />

physical shortage of notes <strong>and</strong> coin since these are supplied by the central<br />

bank <strong>and</strong> the mint on dem<strong>and</strong> in exchange for depos<strong>its</strong>. The shortage, thus,<br />

takes the form of bank depos<strong>its</strong> not growing sufficiently rapidly. Since, as<br />

we shall see in Section 3.2, bank depos<strong>its</strong> are created when banks make<br />

loans, the shortage arises through banks being unwilling or unable to meet<br />

fully the increased borrowing requirements of consumers at existing interest<br />

rates. In this situation, two broad outcomes are possible.<br />

Firstly, the price of borrowing (the interest rate) might rise. This would<br />

overcome the shortage if, <strong>and</strong> only if, the increase in interest rates persuaded<br />

people to borrow less <strong>and</strong> hence to spend less. That is, we are introducing<br />

an additional constraint on aggregate expenditure within the ability to<br />

borrow: the willingness to borrow. This willingness is tempered by the cost<br />

of borrowing. It would also be possible for the authorities to seek to restrict<br />

borrowing (credit) in other ways, such as imposing minimum repayment<br />

amounts. This is clear enough, but the situation is complicated by the story<br />

being told in two, apparently conflicting ways. The first sees the <strong>monetary</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!