22.05.2013 Views

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MONETARY POLICY IN THE USA 435<br />

• the long-run is quite distant <strong>and</strong><br />

• short-run gains in employment <strong>and</strong> output are well worth having.<br />

We return in these circumstances to simple Keynesian truths:<br />

• if unemployment is rising <strong>and</strong> people fear for their jobs, they will<br />

reduce their spending<br />

• if consumers reduce their spending, prof<strong>its</strong> will fall <strong>and</strong> firms will<br />

reduce their output<br />

• as prof<strong>its</strong> fall, firms will cut investment<br />

• as output <strong>and</strong> investment fall, firms will lay off workers.<br />

The role of <strong>monetary</strong> <strong>policy</strong> in these circumstances is to encourage people<br />

to spend <strong>and</strong> firms to invest by lowering the cost of doing so. These<br />

points were made throughout 2001 in FOMC statements.<br />

The decade of the 1990s had started with interest rates relatively high.<br />

At the beginning of July 1990, the target Fed funds rate stood at 8.25 per<br />

cent. The early 1990s, however, saw a downturn in all developed<br />

economies <strong>and</strong> the Fed set out on a long series of interest cuts, which saw<br />

the target rate fall sharply. In 1991, the Fed was extraordinarily active, making<br />

10 cuts in the intended Fed funds rate, bringing it down from 7 per cent<br />

to 4 per cent. That is, the FOMC not only cut the interest rate at each of <strong>its</strong><br />

8 regular meetings, but also made further reductions in two special telephone<br />

linkups. Three more cuts followed in 1992, bringing the rate to 3 per<br />

cent by September, but this was as far as the Fed was prepared to go <strong>and</strong> the<br />

rate was then left unchanged for seventeen months until February 1994, by<br />

which time the US economy had started on a long period of rapid growth.<br />

The Fed, worried now about developing inflationary pressure, then pushed<br />

the rate up sharply. It made six increases in the target rate in 1994, two of<br />

fifty <strong>basis</strong> points <strong>and</strong> one (November) by the unusually large amount of 75<br />

<strong>basis</strong> points. A further 50-<strong>basis</strong>-point increase in February 1995 meant that<br />

the rate had doubled from 3 per cent to 6 per cent in just twelve months.<br />

Perhaps this had been too far <strong>and</strong> too fast. In the following twelve months,<br />

three 25-point cuts had restored the target to 5.25 per cent.<br />

Then came a period of extraordinary calm. Almost nothing happened<br />

from January 1996 until September 1998. In a period of two <strong>and</strong> three-quarter<br />

years, there was only a small increase in March 1997 as the economy<br />

kept growing but without generating serious concerns of inflation. Towards<br />

the end of 1998, a crisis developed in Asian financial markets <strong>and</strong> spread to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!