22.05.2013 Views

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE MEANING OF MONEY 9<br />

resources’ consist of his existing wealth <strong>and</strong> the amount he is able to borrow,<br />

allowing for any existing indebtedness.<br />

This requires us to say something briefly about the meaning of ‘wealth’.<br />

The simplest approach is to think of wealth as the total of the real <strong>and</strong> financial<br />

assets owned by people. Clearly, wealth is a major determinant of the<br />

ability to borrow. However, it is not the only determinant. For example,<br />

banks are often quite willing to lend to impoverished students - not on the<br />

<strong>basis</strong> of their existing wealth but because they assume that the students are<br />

likely to receive good incomes in the future <strong>and</strong> that this will enable them<br />

to repay their debts. We can allow for this by accepting Milton Friedman’s<br />

(1957) very broad definition of wealth, which adds ‘human wealth’ to the<br />

total of real <strong>and</strong> financial assets (non-human wealth). Human wealth consists<br />

of abilities <strong>and</strong> skills that enable people to borrow against likely future<br />

income. The willingness of a financial institution to lend may arise from the<br />

existing skills or abilities of the borrower or current enrolment on a course<br />

of study that will probably develop the necessary skills. Thus, this broad<br />

definition of wealth provides a better indication of the ability to borrow <strong>and</strong><br />

hence a measure of ‘spending resources’. Of course, even this is not complete<br />

since banks might lend also because the borrowers’ parents are well<br />

off or because he has a satisfactory business plan, is associated with someone<br />

with a reasonable track record in business or much else.<br />

Much is made in many books of the importance of ‘liquidity’— generally<br />

defined as the ability to convert assets quickly <strong>and</strong> with little or no risk<br />

into money. Assets are often classified in terms of degrees of liquidity, with<br />

money <strong>its</strong>elf being the perfectly liquid asset since it is, by definition, directly<br />

exchangeable for goods <strong>and</strong> services. Thus, a house is not a liquid asset<br />

because it is difficult to sell quickly <strong>and</strong> equities are less liquid than money<br />

because although they can be sold quickly their prices fluctuate from day to<br />

day <strong>and</strong> one can never be sure of the amount of money one will receive for<br />

them when they are eventually sold. However, all assets are effectively<br />

made liquid to the extent that one can borrow against them.<br />

As we have suggested above, there are occasions when the possession of<br />

‘spending resources’, while necessary, is insufficient for undertaking transactions<br />

because the resources are not in a form acceptable in exchange (that<br />

is, they are illiquid). However, this is usually important to individuals only<br />

at the level of convenience, not having, for example, enough cash to buy<br />

another beer <strong>and</strong> with the nearest bank cash machine either five miles away<br />

or not functioning. 2 This lack of liquidity can be overcome by an inconvenient<br />

trip to a more distant bank machine or by a loan — from the pub<br />

owner or a friend or, perhaps with a short delay, from a financial institution.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!