22.05.2013 Views

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

34 MONETARY ECONOMICS<br />

sufficiently low. Even the very poor can borrow from pawnbrokers or ‘loan<br />

sharks’ <strong>and</strong>, when they do so, what they receive is money. In these cases,<br />

it is not ‘money’ that is scarce. People talk of not having enough ‘money’<br />

but what they lack is ‘spending resources’ as we have defined them above:<br />

real <strong>and</strong> financial assets together with the ability to borrow.<br />

Pause for thought 2.3:<br />

What does the word ‘money’ mean in the following quotation from Shakespeare’s<br />

The Merchant of Venice, Act I Scene III?<br />

‘Hath a dog money? Is it possible a cur can lend three thous<strong>and</strong> ducats?’<br />

Things may be different, however, at an aggregate level. Much depends<br />

on whether we accept the notion that the authorities could <strong>and</strong> should operate<br />

on the interest rate by attempting to control the stock of money. In this<br />

case, we would need a clear idea of what constitutes the money supply <strong>and</strong><br />

some ability to measure it. If, however, the authorities attempt to control<br />

spending directly by adjusting the interest rate, we do not need to define or<br />

to measure ‘money’ even at an aggregate level. We might still choose to<br />

attempt to do so but only perhaps as one of a number of indicators of the<br />

desirability of adjusting the interest rate. The fact that we might only have<br />

a very limited <strong>and</strong> specific need for a definition of ‘money’ in <strong>economics</strong><br />

may well influence the definition we use, although we should bear in mind<br />

that the interest of economists in money is not limited to the macroeconomic<br />

relationship between the aggregate money supply <strong>and</strong> aggregate dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Let us look, next, at the various approaches to the definition of money in<br />

<strong>economics</strong>.<br />

Descriptive definitions of money<br />

A st<strong>and</strong>ard approach is to begin with the three roles attributed to money in<br />

the economy. We have mentioned two of these: money as a medium of<br />

exchange <strong>and</strong> money as a unit of account. The third is as a store of value in<br />

that the use of money allows for the separation of supply <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> in<br />

time. Goods <strong>and</strong> services can be produced <strong>and</strong> sold in one time period <strong>and</strong><br />

the proceeds held in the form of money until a later period when they can<br />

be used to purchase goods <strong>and</strong> services. Exchanges in a <strong>monetary</strong> economy<br />

are accepted as non-synchronized. This is accepted as a benefit because<br />

it removes ‘the double coincidence of wants’ associated with barter — the<br />

need to find a buyer for your goods who also happens to sell the goods you<br />

desire. In this way, the use of money saves greatly on search <strong>and</strong> informa-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!