22.05.2013 Views

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MONETARY POLICY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION 409<br />

2001 might cause inflationary pressures to develop in late 2002 <strong>and</strong> 2003<br />

that would cause the inflation rate to become unacceptably high. The<br />

Governing Council of the ECB, therefore, chose to leave interest rates<br />

unchanged.<br />

In the light of the performance of the euro <strong>and</strong> the targets established for<br />

<strong>its</strong>elf by the ECB, what can we say about European <strong>monetary</strong> <strong>policy</strong> since<br />

1999? First of all, we should note that, in the 37 months during which the<br />

ECB has been responsible for <strong>monetary</strong> <strong>policy</strong>, the inflation rate has been<br />

within the target range on only 16 occasions. All of these were in the early<br />

months of operation of the ECB when, as we have suggested above, the<br />

inflation rate was being influenced more by the separate <strong>monetary</strong> policies<br />

in existence before 1999 than by anything done by the ECB. Indeed, inflation<br />

was outside of <strong>its</strong> target range for 20 consecutive months from June<br />

2000 to January 2002. Despite this, we are not in a position to suggest that<br />

ECB <strong>policy</strong> has failed since, as we have indicated above, <strong>its</strong> approach to<br />

<strong>policy</strong> is sufficiently opaque to leave us uncertain regarding the precise<br />

intentions. Inflation has certainly not run out of control <strong>and</strong> shows no sign<br />

of doing so. Indeed, the forecast for 2002 shown in Table 13.4 suggests that<br />

the average annual inflation rate for the euro area in 2002 will be only 1.5<br />

per cent, well within the target range.<br />

Part of the problem stems from the dubious role of the <strong>monetary</strong> growth<br />

reference value. In December 2001, the ECB reaffirmed the <strong>monetary</strong><br />

growth reference value as 4.5 per cent, but we have noted a tendency to<br />

attribute growth rates above this level to temporary <strong>and</strong> irrelevant factors.<br />

It should be clear from other sections of the book that we have no problem<br />

with the downgrading of a <strong>monetary</strong> target. However, it seems odd that<br />

<strong>monetary</strong> growth continues to be acknowledged as the ‘first pillar’ of <strong>policy</strong><br />

when all that occurs is that ‘developments of M3 are continuously <strong>and</strong><br />

thoroughly analysed by the ECB in the broader context of other <strong>monetary</strong><br />

indicators <strong>and</strong> information from the second pillar to assess their implications<br />

for the risks to price stability over the medium term.’ 11<br />

To conclude, we need to mention two other possible concerns regarding<br />

<strong>monetary</strong> <strong>policy</strong> in the euro area. The first concerns the unevenness of<br />

inflationary pressures across the area. The Organization for Economic<br />

Cooperation <strong>and</strong> Development (OECD) figures for the annual increase in<br />

consumer prices (per cent, p.a.) in the euro area for the year 2001 were:<br />

Austria 1.9 Germany 1.7 Netherl<strong>and</strong>s 4.4<br />

Belgium 2.9 Irel<strong>and</strong> 4.2 Portugal 3.7<br />

Belgium 2.9 Italy 2.4 Spain 2.7<br />

France 1.4 Luxembourg 1.7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!