22.05.2013 Views

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

bain_y_howells__monetary_economics__policy_and_its_theoretical_basis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tion costs in an economy (see Section 1.4).<br />

The dominant role of these three is usually taken to be money as a medium<br />

of exchange. This f<strong>its</strong> in with the common view of money exemplified<br />

by the dictionary definition given in Section 1.2. Further, any asset that performs<br />

the role of a medium of exchange is generally held to be able also to<br />

act as a store of value <strong>and</strong> a unit of account. Hicks (1967) denied this, arguing<br />

that money could be a medium of exchange without being a store of<br />

value as long as, over the course of a day’s trading, no individuals have sold<br />

more than they have bought <strong>and</strong> vice versa. However, this would be a very<br />

special case <strong>and</strong> the usual view is that all forms of money are stores of<br />

value, whereas the reverse is not true (see Harris, 1985). Thus, acting as a<br />

medium of exchange is the only role that clearly sets money apart from<br />

other assets.<br />

Pause for thought 2.4:<br />

DEFINITIONS OF MONEY IN ECONOMICS 35<br />

What is a cash-in-advance constraint? (If in doubt, see Section 1.4). Would money<br />

be a medium of exchange but not a store of value if there were a cash-in-advance<br />

constraint?<br />

Our discussion above, however, alerted us to a problem with the notion<br />

of ‘money’ as a medium of exchange since credit acts as a medium of<br />

exchange but is almost always excluded from definitions of ‘money’. One<br />

way out is to follow Shackle (1971) <strong>and</strong> distinguish between the medium of<br />

exchange (which includes credit) <strong>and</strong> a means of payment, in the sense of a<br />

means of final settlement of debt. It is this latter idea that most writers have<br />

in mind. Among the definitions along these lines, we have:<br />

...a temporary abode of purchasing power (Friedman, 1963);<br />

...any asset which gives immediate comm<strong>and</strong> over goods <strong>and</strong> services<br />

(Struthers <strong>and</strong> Speight, 1986);<br />

...any property right that is generally acceptable in exchange (Fisher,<br />

1911).<br />

These are descriptive or a priori definitions of money deriving from the<br />

notion of money as a means of payment but also admit of the idea of a store<br />

of value. However, none of them gives a precise idea of which assets should<br />

be included in a measure of the economy’s money stock. Everything<br />

depends on what is acceptable.<br />

Nonetheless, the concentration on the role of money as a means of payment<br />

led to the common acceptance of the ‘narrow’ view of money as an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!