- Page 1: State of the Bay 2010: Saldanha Bay
- Page 6 and 7: Anchor Environmental 6 SEDIMENTS 11
- Page 8 and 9: Anchor Environmental 13.3.1 Particl
- Page 10 and 11: Anchor Environmental the beach towa
- Page 12 and 13: Anchor Environmental Figure 6.5. Av
- Page 14 and 15: Anchor Environmental Figure 8.17. M
- Page 16 and 17: Anchor Environmental Figure 10.8. M
- Page 18 and 19: LIST OF TABLES Anchor Environmental
- Page 20 and 21: Anchor Environmental Table 6.6. Pol
- Page 22 and 23: Anchor Environmental small craft ha
- Page 24 and 25: Anchor Environmental required in th
- Page 26 and 27: Anchor Environmental which feed dir
- Page 28 and 29: Anchor Environmental took place (i.
- Page 30 and 31: Summary Anchor Environmental In sum
- Page 32 and 33: Anchor Environmental Shore height z
- Page 34 and 35: Anchor Environmental In spite of th
- Page 36 and 37: Anchor Environmental 3 BACKGROUND T
- Page 38 and 39: Anchor Environmental Aside from mon
- Page 40 and 41: Anchor Environmental integrate chan
- Page 42 and 43: Anchor Environmental species groups
- Page 44 and 45: Anchor Environmental and iron-ore j
- Page 46 and 47: Anchor Environmental Figure 4.4. Co
- Page 48 and 49: Anchor Environmental Figure 4.5. Ae
- Page 50 and 51: Anchor Environmental Future develop
- Page 52 and 53: Anchor Environmental with the rest
- Page 54 and 55:
Anchor Environmental the constructi
- Page 56 and 57:
Relative Area (x 1 000 m 2 ) 150 10
- Page 58 and 59:
Anchor Environmental Figure 4.11. R
- Page 60 and 61:
4.3.3.3 Paradise beach erosion mana
- Page 62 and 63:
Anchor Environmental In South Afric
- Page 64 and 65:
Anchor Environmental Associated wit
- Page 66 and 67:
4.3.5.2 Potential Impacts Anchor En
- Page 68 and 69:
Anchor Environmental Some of the in
- Page 70 and 71:
Anchor Environmental Until recently
- Page 72 and 73:
Faecal coliforms (org/100 ml)) Flow
- Page 74 and 75:
Anchor Environmental The concentrat
- Page 76 and 77:
Amonia (mg/l as N) Nitrate(mg/l as
- Page 78 and 79:
Anchor Environmental Figure 4.23. S
- Page 80 and 81:
SA Lobster Live Fish Tanks Sea Harv
- Page 82 and 83:
Anchor Environmental six operators
- Page 84 and 85:
4.3.10 Development of a Liquid Petr
- Page 86 and 87:
Temperature (C) Temperature (C) 22
- Page 88 and 89:
Anchor Environmental during the win
- Page 90 and 91:
AOU (ml/l) AOU (ml/l) 5 4 3 2 1 0 -
- Page 92 and 93:
) A ) Anchor Environmental Figure 5
- Page 94 and 95:
Anchor Environmental pollution with
- Page 96 and 97:
Anchor Environmental Table 5.3. Per
- Page 98 and 99:
Anchor Environmental Table 5.5. Per
- Page 100 and 101:
Anchor Environmental Table 5.7. Per
- Page 102 and 103:
Anchor Environmental Table 5.9. Per
- Page 104 and 105:
7 4 3 5 6 2 95 th Percentile recrea
- Page 106 and 107:
Counts per 100ml of sample 10000 10
- Page 108 and 109:
State of the Bay 2010: Saldanha Bay
- Page 110 and 111:
Concentrations (ppm) Concentrations
- Page 112 and 113:
State of the Bay 2010: Saldanha Bay
- Page 114 and 115:
State of the Bay 2010: Saldanha Bay
- Page 116 and 117:
State of the Bay 2010: Saldanha Bay
- Page 118 and 119:
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20
- Page 120 and 121:
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20
- Page 122 and 123:
6.2 Particulate Organic Carbon (POC
- Page 124 and 125:
Figure 6.6. Variation in the % Orga
- Page 126 and 127:
% PON 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 % PON
- Page 128 and 129:
State of the Bay 2010: Saldanha Bay
- Page 130 and 131:
Table 6.4: Concentrations (mg/kg) o
- Page 132 and 133:
Figure 6.14. Variation in the conce
- Page 134 and 135:
have a high copper content. There i
- Page 136 and 137:
(surface) sediments in the Bay. Con
- Page 138 and 139:
published by the NOAA. Both lead an
- Page 140 and 141:
Lead (mg/kg) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 1
- Page 142 and 143:
Nickel (mg/kg) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5
- Page 144 and 145:
35 30 25 20 15 10 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 5 0
- Page 146 and 147:
Table 6.6. Poly-aromatic hydrocarbo
- Page 148 and 149:
7 AQUATIC MACROPHYTES IN LANGEBAAN
- Page 150 and 151:
the species associated with it (Sie
- Page 152 and 153:
8 BENTHIC MACROFAUNA 8.1 Background
- Page 154 and 155:
2009, 2010) all employed diver-oper
- Page 156 and 157:
Figure 8.2. Benthic macrofauna stat
- Page 158 and 159:
8.3.2.3 Diversity Indices A number
- Page 160 and 161:
Table 8.2. Five most dominant speci
- Page 162 and 163:
SIMPER analysis revealed that the s
- Page 164 and 165:
Proportion of total number of indiv
- Page 166 and 167:
Number of individuals per m² Numbe
- Page 168 and 169:
the spatial differences in communit
- Page 170 and 171:
Wet mass per m² Wet mass per m² W
- Page 172 and 173:
Proportion of total number of indiv
- Page 174 and 175:
Figure 8.12. Variation in the W sta
- Page 176 and 177:
Table 8.3. W statistics at all stat
- Page 178 and 179:
Total no species (S) Species richne
- Page 180 and 181:
growing, large bodied species in Bi
- Page 182 and 183:
Figure 8.18. MDS of Saldanha Bay an
- Page 184 and 185:
8.5 Discussion Macrobenthic communi
- Page 186 and 187:
Bay for 2009 was very similar to th
- Page 188 and 189:
Isopod spp Amphipod spp Polychaete
- Page 190 and 191:
9 INTERTIDAL INVERTEBRATES (ROCKY S
- Page 192 and 193:
The semi-exposed site Lynch Point (
- Page 194 and 195:
Iron Ore Jetty North Bay Lynch Poin
- Page 196 and 197:
9.3 Results and Discussion 9.3.1 20
- Page 198 and 199:
mussel abundance, the sheltered bou
- Page 200 and 201:
surfaces and prefer those with more
- Page 202 and 203:
Abundance (no/0.5m 2 ) Figure 9.7.
- Page 204 and 205:
With an increase in similarity (50%
- Page 206 and 207:
Percentage cover Species Number 36
- Page 208 and 209:
Table 9.3. Results of one-way ANOVA
- Page 210 and 211:
Table 9.4. PERMANOVA pairwise-testi
- Page 212 and 213:
Percentage cover Percentage cover P
- Page 214 and 215:
Percentage cover Percentage cover P
- Page 216 and 217:
is determined by the mussel. The fu
- Page 218 and 219:
10 FISH COMMUNITY COMPOSITION AND A
- Page 220 and 221:
of the most common fish species cau
- Page 222 and 223:
ather than an indication in fundame
- Page 224 and 225:
State of the Bay 2010: Saldanha Bay
- Page 226 and 227:
Anchor Environmental 10.3.2 Descrip
- Page 228 and 229:
Anchor Environmental Bay or sites w
- Page 230 and 231:
Anchor Environmental differences in
- Page 232 and 233:
Transform: Fourth root Resemblance:
- Page 234 and 235:
11 BIRDS 11.1 Introduction Anchor E
- Page 236 and 237:
Number of breeding pairs 2400 2200
- Page 238 and 239:
Number of breeding pairs Anchor Env
- Page 240 and 241:
Anchor Environmental forage more th
- Page 242 and 243:
Number of breeding pairs 26000 2400
- Page 244 and 245:
Anchor Environmental No breeding pa
- Page 246 and 247:
Anchor Environmental increase in Oy
- Page 248 and 249:
Anchor Environmental Table 11.1. Ta
- Page 250 and 251:
Number of birds 45000 40000 35000 3
- Page 252 and 253:
Anchor Environmental 12 ALIEN INVAS
- Page 254 and 255:
Taxon Gastropoda Anchor Environment
- Page 256 and 257:
Anchor Environmental Figure 12.2. M
- Page 258 and 259:
Anchor Environmental Act, 2009) and
- Page 260 and 261:
13.2 Water Quality 13.2.1 Temperatu
- Page 262 and 263:
13.4 Benthic macrofauna Anchor Envi
- Page 264 and 265:
Anchor Environmental Table 11.1. Ta
- Page 266 and 267:
14 REFERENCES Anchor Environmental
- Page 268 and 269:
Anchor Environmental Bustamante R.H
- Page 270 and 271:
Anchor Environmental Davidson IC, C
- Page 272 and 273:
Anchor Environmental Hanekom, N. an
- Page 274 and 275:
Anchor Environmental Makhado, A.B.,
- Page 276 and 277:
Anchor Environmental PDNA and SRK C
- Page 278 and 279:
Anchor Environmental Simon-Blecher,
- Page 280:
Anchor Environmental Whittington, P