10 Draft Integrated Waste Management Plan - City Council - City of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2012 Davis Integrated Waste Management Plan Appendix K - Diversion Rates: Historical and Projected 4.0 4.2 4.5 4.1 4.1 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 FIGURE K-1 CITY OF DAVIS PER CAPITA RESIDENTIAL DISPOSAL 3.9 3.6 3.9 4.3 3.9 3.8 3.5 3.6 City of Davis’ 1995-2006 per capita rates are calculated from the per capita disposal target set for Davis by CalRecycle in 2007 and the CalRecycle assigned diversion rates post 2007. Data from 2007-2009 is provided by CalRecycle. Pounds Per Person Per Day Pounds Per Person Per Day 5.0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 17.3 18.3 20.0 17.9 17.9 18.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 1995 1996 1997 1998 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 FIGURE K-2 CITY OF DAVIS PER CAPITA EMPLOYMENT DISPOSAL DRAFT 1999 16.9 16.9 15.6 2000 2001 18.9 2002 2003 City of Davis’ 1995-2006 per capita rates are calculated from the per capita disposal target set for Davis by CalRecycle in 2007 and the CalRecycle assigned diversion rates post 2007. Data from 2007-2009 is provided by CalRecycle. 2007 3.3 2008 3 3.1 2009 2010 2.6 2011 16.9 16.6 15.3 15 15.5 14.1 13.6 12.1 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2012 2013 2014 2013 2014 2015 2016 2015 2016 2017 2017 2018 2019 2018 2019 1.9 2020 8.3 2020 Page | K-184
2012 Davis Integrated Waste Management Plan Diversion Rate 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 48% 45% 46% 46% 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FIGURE K-3 CITY OF DAVIS DIVERSION 49% 53% 54% 54% 57% 49% 49% 50% 43% 60% 65% 56% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 City of Davis’ 2007-2010 diversion rates are calculated from the per capita disposal target set for Davis by CalRecycle in 2007. Data from 1995-2006 is provided by CalRecycle. Comparison of Davis’ Diversion to other jurisdictions: As the charts above show, the City of Davis is on track with its goal of reaching its year 2020 waste reduction target. However, it is often requested that the City’s CalRecycle calculated diversion or per capital disposal rate be compared to other local agencies. The charts and tables below offer such a comparison. However, it must be noted that CalRecycle itself strictly advises against such comparisons: Advisory! The per capita disposal rate is a jurisdiction-specific index and cannot be compared between jurisdictions. The per capita disposal rate is used as one of several "factors" in determining a jurisdiction's compliance with the intent of AB 939, and allows the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) and jurisdictions to set their primary focus on successful implementation of diversion programs. Meeting the disposal rate targets is not necessarily an indication of compliance. http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/reports/diversionprogram/JurisdictionDiversionPost2006.aspx DRAFT The best way to compare one jurisdiction to another is to look at the generation. The tables and figures below compare the residential and employee waste generation of several jurisdictions. 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 75% 2020 Page | K-185
Page 1 and 2:
DRAFT
Page 3 and 4:
2012 Davis Integrated Waste Managem
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150: 2012 Davis Integrated Waste Managem
Page 199: 2012 Davis Integrated Waste Managem
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259:
show all

10 Draft Integrated Waste Management Plan - City Council - City of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?