06.07.2013 Views

10 Draft Integrated Waste Management Plan - City Council - City of ...

10 Draft Integrated Waste Management Plan - City Council - City of ...

10 Draft Integrated Waste Management Plan - City Council - City of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2012 Davis <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

It is <strong>of</strong>ten requested that the <strong>City</strong>’s diversion or per capita disposal rate be compared to other local agencies. The<br />

charts and tables presented in Appendix K <strong>of</strong>fer such a comparison. However, it must be noted that CalRecycle<br />

itself strictly advises against such comparisons:<br />

Advisory! The per capita disposal rate is a jurisdiction-specific index and cannot be compared between<br />

jurisdictions. The per capita disposal rate is used as one <strong>of</strong> several "factors" in determining a<br />

jurisdiction's compliance with the intent <strong>of</strong> AB 939, and allows the California Department <strong>of</strong> Resources<br />

Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) and jurisdictions to set their primary focus on successful<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> diversion programs. Meeting the disposal rate targets is not necessarily an indication<br />

<strong>of</strong> compliance.<br />

http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/reports/diversionprogram/JurisdictionDiversionPost2006.aspx<br />

Unfortunately, this warning is rarely heeded and comparisons between other jurisdictions are frequently<br />

performed regardless. If a comparison must be done, the best way to compare one jurisdiction to another is to<br />

look at the waste generation. The tables and figures in Appendix K compare the residential and employee waste<br />

generation per capita numbers <strong>of</strong> several jurisdictions.<br />

The State <strong>of</strong> California took another step to increase diversion in 2011, when the governor signed AB 341,<br />

increasing the current State goal from 50% diversion to 75% recycling by 2020. AB 341 created the Mandatory<br />

Commercial Recycling law, which requires that all businesses that generate four or more cubic yards <strong>of</strong> waste<br />

each week and all multi-family communities with five or more units must arrange for recycling service. Most<br />

Davis customers that fall under the Mandatory Commercial Recycling Law are already required to recycle<br />

under Chapter 32 <strong>of</strong> the Davis Municipal Code (see Appendix A). The few customers that do not are reviewed<br />

yearly by DWR and <strong>City</strong> staff for compliance.<br />

The <strong>City</strong>’s past, current and future projected diversion rates and per capita disposal rates are shown in Appendix<br />

K.<br />

7.1.2 Davis <strong>City</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Goals and Key Objectives 2012-2014<br />

The Recycling Program is guided by several <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>Council</strong> 2012-2014 key objectives <strong>of</strong> Fiscal Stability,<br />

Sustainability and Community Strength and Effectiveness. The Sustainability goal and guiding principles are<br />

listed below.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Sustainability<br />

Enact policies that strive to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> the present without compromising the ability <strong>of</strong> future generations<br />

to meet their own needs.<br />

Guiding Principles:<br />

Reduce the community’s carbon footprint and achieve measurable GHG emission reductions.<br />

Focus on mobility systems that will reduce carbon emissions.<br />

Increase water and energy efficiency <strong>of</strong> existing resources and explore alternatives.<br />

Conserve resources in an environmentally responsible manner.<br />

Promote reduction <strong>of</strong> resource consumption and waste generation, preserve agriculture, promote local<br />

food production, reduce automobile and energy use, foster a healthy and vibrant economic climate based<br />

on green technologies, and create a people-centric urban design environment.<br />

Actively participate in regional planning activities in the areas <strong>of</strong> transit, air quality, water and<br />

wastewater resources, land use and agricultural and open space conservation.<br />

Page | 7-52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!