06.07.2013 Views

10 Draft Integrated Waste Management Plan - City Council - City of ...

10 Draft Integrated Waste Management Plan - City Council - City of ...

10 Draft Integrated Waste Management Plan - City Council - City of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2012 Davis <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Since plastic bags do not significantly contribute to the amount <strong>of</strong> waste going to the landfill, a carryout bag<br />

ordinance is not a priority item to achieve the <strong>City</strong>’s 2020 waste reduction target.<br />

Banning plastic bags may assist in reducing litter, but only minimally. A large percentage <strong>of</strong> storm water from<br />

the streets in Davis (and plastic bags that are swept up in the storm water) pass though screens and detention<br />

ponds where plastic bags are removed from the water before it flows to the Willow Slough Bypass or Yolo<br />

Bypass. Storm drain inlets and the detention ponds themselves are cleaned regularly. Recycling Program staff<br />

rarely receives complaints from street crews regarding plastic bag litter.<br />

Plastic bags at the landfill are blown about by the wind and can contribute to litter. The landfill uses screens to<br />

catch litter that is blown by the wind, but some litter escapes these screens. The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> Davis is only one<br />

contributor to the material at the landfill. Banning bags in Davis will not alleviate the bag problem at the YCCL<br />

unless all the other cities adopt similar laws. At this point in time, none <strong>of</strong> the other cities in Yolo County, nor<br />

the County itself, are pursuing a carryout bag ordinance.<br />

Plastic bags are also an issue for DWR, where they are a litter issue and a nuisance at their recycling facility.<br />

DWR’s customers live in and around Davis, banning plastic bags may have a significant impact in litter<br />

reduction for DWR.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the concerns with banning plastic bags and not paper bags is the potential increase in the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

paper bags being used, and the possible increase in paper bags going into the landfill. In the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> Manhattan<br />

Beach vs. Save the Plastic Bag Coalition, the Court report stated:<br />

On this record, it is undisputed that the manufacture, transportation, recycling, and landfill disposal <strong>of</strong><br />

paper bags entail more negative environmental consequences than do the same aspects <strong>of</strong> the plastic<br />

bag “life cycle.”<br />

Since a paper bag weighs more than a plastic bag, the effect <strong>of</strong> paper bags on the waste stream is more<br />

substantial.<br />

Paper bags are accepted for recycling curbside and in all DWR recycling bins. In Davis, plastic bags can only<br />

be recycled at grocery stores. This should make it more likely that paper bags will be recycled instead <strong>of</strong><br />

landfilled.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Plastic bags are not accepted by DWR for recycling. A recycling option does exist however—AB 2449 requires<br />

large grocery stores and pharmacies to take back plastic bags for recycling, so residents can bring their plastic<br />

bags back to the store for recycling. However, this system hasn’t been very effective. According to CAW, in<br />

California, 14 billion plastic bags are distributed annually, and only 3% are recycled. AB 2449 requires grocery<br />

stores to take back plastic bags for recycling, but the law sunsets at the end <strong>of</strong> 2012.<br />

The ending <strong>of</strong> AB 2449 creates a potential recycling challenge, but may create an opportunity for future bag<br />

bans. AB 2449 expressly disallowed charging a fee for plastic bags, while allowing one for paper. Once AB<br />

2449 ends, it would be possible to rewrite the <strong>City</strong>’s draft ordinance to allow single-use plastic bags as long as<br />

stores charge a fee, as is required for paper bags under the current draft ordinance. This may eliminate some <strong>of</strong><br />

the opposition to the draft ordinance that the <strong>City</strong> encountered as the draft was prepared.<br />

A bill was introduced (AB 298) that would have extended the plastic bag recycling provisions <strong>of</strong> 2449 while<br />

limiting the use <strong>of</strong> plastic and paper carryout bags statewide (see Appendix H for the full text <strong>of</strong> this bill).<br />

However, the bill did not pass the senate.<br />

Page | 7-61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!