10 Draft Integrated Waste Management Plan - City Council - City of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2012 Davis Integrated Waste Management Plan TABLE 8-1 DWR AND CITY RATE INCREASES FOR SINGLE-FAMILY CUSTOMERS 8.1.2 Revenue Requirements and Reserves Year DWR Increase City Rate Increase Difference 1998 0.00% 0% 0.00% 1999 2.61% 0% 2.61% 2000 0.00% 0% 0.00% 2001 4.23% 8.84% -4.61% 2002 4.42% 0% 4.42% 2003 3.47% 3.17% 0.30% 2004 1.99% 0% 1.99% 2005 1.53% 6.68% -5.15% 2006 1.73% 4.61% -2.88% 2007 2.52% 1.87% 0.65% 2008 3.08% 2.27% 0.81% 2009 2.44% 1.80% 0.64% 2010 2.16% 0% 2.16% 2011 1.39% 3.01% -1.62% 2012 2.36% 0% 2.36% Average 2.26% 2.15% 0.11% The current contract with Davis Waste Removal is built around landfill disposal fees and annual Consumer Price Index adjustments (transportation costs). On average, the City increases payments to DWR 2-3% annually, but in the past have not implemented regular rate increases to the customer (see table 8-1). This policy of non-uniform rate increases is not sustainable. A regular yearly increase of 2-3% to the customer is more in sync with the contract and reflects real world costs. At present, the City does not have a reserve policy or plan for the solid waste fund. This is not a fiscally responsible way of dealing with such a major utility. It is important to establish priorities, policy and reserve requirements for the different financial requirements of the solid waste fund. It is recommended that the City develop a solid waste fund reserve policy that will be discussed as part of the June 2013 rate discussion for the 2013-2014 rate adjustments. DRAFT The table below shows unfunded reserves needed in the Solid Waste Fund. These reserves are discussed in detail below. Page | 8-68
2012 Davis Integrated Waste Management Plan TABLE 8-2 SOLID WASTE FUND RESERVE NEEDS Reserve Amount Required Amortized Over Min. Reserve Requirement Current Balance Old Davis Landfill Closure $5,000,000 20 years $250,000 $0 YCCL Tipping Fees $120,000 5 years $24,000 $0 CalRecycle Grant Funds $35,000 2 years $17,500 $0 Penalties/Fines $90,000 5 years $18,000 $0 Storm $50,000 5 years $10,000 $0 Transportation Mitigation Fee $1,500,000 15 years $100,000 $0 Franchise Tax (2-15%) $192,000 - 5 years $40,000 - $0 $1,400,000 $216,000 Hazardous/Disaster Waste $35,000 5 years $7,000 $0 Emergency Garbage Service $700,000 5 years $140,000 $0 Total $7,530,000 $782,500 $0 Old Davis Landfill Closure—The largest reserve needed is to manage closing costs of the Old Davis Landfill. The Old Davis Landfill is located just north of the City on County Road 102. At this time, the landfill is being used as a shooting range and go-cart track. If the City were to need or use that land for other urban purposes, such a housing, commercial, etc., the landfill would have to undergo an extensive environmental documentation, clean-up, and management process before development can occur. YCCL Tipping Fees—At this time, tipping fees are generally raised marginally each year. However, it is not unheard of for tipping fees to jump much higher. The City has a 20 year tipping fee contract with the County that was signed in 2009. The contract has automatic tipping fee increases based on the consumer price index (CPI) or 3%, whichever is lower. See the table below for recent tipping fees. This fund is recommended to be built up over 5 years, starting with June 2013 rates. Local tipping fees are also a potential pass through mechanism for the State to recover revenues associated with meeting its long term Integrated Waste Management and Climate Action Plan objectives. TABLE 8-3 YCCL TIPPING FEES DRAFT Fiscal Year Tipping Fee Rate Change 2000-2001 $36.00 0% 2001-2002 $36.00 0% 2002-2003 $36.00 0% 2003-2004 $36.00 0% 2004-2005 $36.00 0% 2005-2006 $36.00 0% 2006-2007 $36.00 0% 2007-2008 $36.00 0% 2008-2009 $36.00 0% 2009-2010 $37.08 3% 2010-2011 $37.72 1.64% 2011-2012 $38.83 2.81% 2012-2013 $39.63 2.06% Page | 8-69
Page 1 and 2:
DRAFT
Page 3 and 4:
2012 Davis Integrated Waste Managem
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34: 2012 Davis Integrated Waste Managem
Page 83: 2012 Davis Integrated Waste Managem
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259:
show all

10 Draft Integrated Waste Management Plan - City Council - City of ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?