21.07.2013 Views

Sanctioning Apartheid - KORA

Sanctioning Apartheid - KORA

Sanctioning Apartheid - KORA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

South Afnam Sanctions Braaking in Southem Africa 329<br />

sanctions in late 1986, as if con6rming the wisdom of the<br />

investors/ touched off a new wave. As the details of sanctions<br />

against South Africa became understood, the soundness of<br />

SwaziIand<br />

-*<br />

as a locus for investment became more widely<br />

Most important WEIS the quick assurance by the Reap<br />

administration that the United States would regard goods<br />

produced in Swazilana and exprted through South Afxica as<br />

exempt from the United States sanctions against Preboria The<br />

exemption encompassed such products of SwePiland as were<br />

"-, graded, packaged, repackaged, marked, containerized/<br />

or otherwise serviced" in South Africa; and it included<br />

goods produced in Swaziland by private South African capital.<br />

Those guarantees simply added to the allure which Swaziland<br />

had traditionally offered during the 1970s and 1980s to the<br />

Sollth African investor. Those included kee srchange of pds<br />

and movement of ftmds between the two munhk Moreover/<br />

independent of South Africa (to which it was linked by a<br />

monetary and Customs Union), Swaziland/ as a signatory to the<br />

Lome Conventions, had tariff and quo& preferences for ag'iculhual<br />

produce and manufactured gods to the 12-member<br />

European Community @C). It was also a member of the 15nation<br />

Prehmtial Trade Area for easkm and southern Africa,<br />

which bed for a graded reduction of between 1096 and 70%<br />

on a common list of trade items. FNy, under the General<br />

System of References of the UN Conference on Trade and<br />

Devdopment, S-d was a beneficiary of the non-reciprocal<br />

tari€f preferences offer& by the US, EC, Austria, Sweden,<br />

Switzerland, and Australia.<br />

Moreover, Swaziland offered a liberal intmpretation of what<br />

qualified goods to be regarded as the "prcrduct" or "manufacture<br />

cd Swaziland" "Rules of 0rigL-f of preferential trade areas or<br />

countries required that about 35% of the dfrect production mfs<br />

of such goods as rrpresenkd by "materials urchased or labour<br />

performed'' be athibutable to Swabland! Other counttier<br />

required even less: a "&cate of origin," which stipulated only<br />

that the product be "Whed in Swaziland and cxrmtain at least<br />

25% I d value added."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!