State Planning Policy 2/07 Guideline - Queensland Mining and Safety
State Planning Policy 2/07 Guideline - Queensland Mining and Safety
State Planning Policy 2/07 Guideline - Queensland Mining and Safety
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
APPENDIX 2: COMPATIBILITY OF DEVELOPMENT IN KEY<br />
RESOURCE AREAS<br />
A2.1 The following material is not intended to be incorporated directly into a planning<br />
scheme, but should be used to help devise appropriate detailed measures for achieving<br />
the <strong>Policy</strong>’s outcome <strong>and</strong> integrating those measures with other provisions of the<br />
planning scheme. Where the <strong>Policy</strong> has not been appropriately reflected in a planning<br />
scheme, this appendix should be used to assist in interpreting the <strong>Policy</strong> in<br />
development assessment.<br />
A2.2 This appendix refers to scheme measures in terms of overlays <strong>and</strong> associated<br />
assessment criteria, <strong>and</strong> is consistent with the approach <strong>and</strong> terminology suggested for<br />
planning schemes in the IPA Plan Making <strong>Guideline</strong> 1/02 published by the<br />
Department of Local Government <strong>and</strong> <strong>Planning</strong>.<br />
Extractive resources overlay<br />
A2.3 The most appropriate way of presenting the mapped information will depend on the<br />
structure of the particular planning scheme. Key Resource Areas can be included as<br />
one or more zones or overlays to which specific development assessment provisions<br />
apply.<br />
Using the tables<br />
A2.4 The tables below set out the following information—<br />
• Column 1: Type of development made assessable or self-assessable – a material<br />
change of use or reconfiguring a lot that would result in development likely to be<br />
incompatible in a Key Resource Area should be made assessable or self-assessable.<br />
Whether development is made assessable or self-assessable depends on whether it is<br />
possible to identify all relevant assessment criteria in a precise way that does not require<br />
any interpretation/discretion. If that is possible, self-assessable is the appropriate<br />
assessment category. It is not necessary to make compatible development assessable<br />
development under the extractive resources overlay. However this development could be<br />
subject to other relevant assessment criteria under the planning scheme.<br />
• Column 2: Specific outcomes – these specific outcomes provide the basis for a local<br />
government to devise the relevant assessment criteria <strong>and</strong> can be used to assess the<br />
compatibility of development in a Key Resource Area.<br />
• Column 3: Solutions – these solutions provide the basis for a local government to devise<br />
solutions for the planning scheme code(s) in the context of the planning scheme area. A<br />
solution can be made an acceptable solution when it can be refined in a way that results in<br />
precise criteria requiring no exercise of discretion to determine whether a development<br />
proposal complies.<br />
<strong>State</strong> <strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> 2/<strong>07</strong> <strong>Guideline</strong><br />
13