23.07.2013 Views

Why Bad Presentations Happen to Good Causes - The Goodman ...

Why Bad Presentations Happen to Good Causes - The Goodman ...

Why Bad Presentations Happen to Good Causes - The Goodman ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

pg. 44<br />

“An audience wants one thing<br />

above all, which is for the<br />

person <strong>to</strong> show up.”<br />

– Paul Hawken<br />

Natural Capital<br />

Institute<br />

Improving Your Delivery<br />

Just Be Yourself. Only Better. – cont’d<br />

Loosen Up and Open Up<br />

Thanks <strong>to</strong> her background in theatre, Eda Roth is intimately familiar with the<br />

relationship between how people carry themselves on stage and the non-verbal messages<br />

they project <strong>to</strong> the audience. When she coaches public interest clients, she <strong>to</strong>ld us, her<br />

main challenge is getting them <strong>to</strong> loosen up and open up. “<strong>The</strong> same people who are<br />

very expressive at their children’s soccer games are not as expressive in their professional<br />

lives,” she says.<br />

To help clients relax and open up, Roth conducts an exercise in which presenters<br />

must start their talk by literally running in<strong>to</strong> the room and exclaiming, “I have the<br />

most incredible thing <strong>to</strong> tell you!” Most clients will respond by jogging <strong>to</strong> the podium<br />

with an embarrassed look on their faces, but Roth sends them back and demands a<br />

full-out sprint. “I want <strong>to</strong> break through the constrictions of so-called professionalism<br />

and get them <strong>to</strong> open up <strong>to</strong> the possibility of a bigger and more visceral expression,”<br />

she explains.<br />

Much <strong>to</strong> her clients’ relief, Roth doesn’t expect them <strong>to</strong> incorporate the running start in<strong>to</strong><br />

their actual presentations. “It’s a matter of stretching out a lot so that when the personality<br />

snaps back, it’s a little larger than it was,” she says. In a similar exercise, Roth will ask<br />

presenters <strong>to</strong> identify the emotion – excitement, anger, empathy, frustration – that is<br />

central <strong>to</strong> their talk. Once they have it, she instructs them <strong>to</strong> make their points saying<br />

exactly what they feel, shorn of any euphemisms or diplomatic language. This no-holdsbarred<br />

exercise helps presenters feel the emotion more clearly, and that’s what Roth wants<br />

them <strong>to</strong> remember when they eventually put the diplomatic language back in<strong>to</strong> their talk.<br />

That “body memory” will make them more expressive, supporting their words with the<br />

right non-verbal messages as well.<br />

Wordsmiths Take Heart (Maybe It Really Is What You Say)<br />

In the 1960s, UCLA professor Albert Mehrabian conducted research <strong>to</strong> measure the<br />

significance of non-verbal cues in communications. From a series of tests involving<br />

face-<strong>to</strong>-face conversations, he concluded that 38% of communication is inflection and<br />

<strong>to</strong>ne of voice, 55% is facial expression, and only 7% is based on what you actually say.<br />

Since then, many communications consultants and public speaking coaches have<br />

cited this study when telling clients, “It’s not what you say but how you say it.”<br />

Unfortunately, like George Miller’s “Magic Number 7,” Mehrabian’s measly 7% does<br />

not necessarily hold for all forms of communication.<br />

In Mehrabian’s study, subjects who played the role of “listener” had only one task: <strong>to</strong><br />

determine how the “speaker” felt about them. In addition, the speakers and listeners<br />

were complete strangers, so there was no additional context for the listeners <strong>to</strong> draw<br />

on. Given that most audience members will have some knowledge of the subjects and<br />

speakers they come <strong>to</strong> hear, and that their intent is more <strong>to</strong> learn than <strong>to</strong> figure out if<br />

the speaker likes them, it seems that where presentations are concerned, Mehrabian’s<br />

findings, while fascinating, probably do not apply.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!