Why Bad Presentations Happen to Good Causes - The Goodman ...
Why Bad Presentations Happen to Good Causes - The Goodman ...
Why Bad Presentations Happen to Good Causes - The Goodman ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Evaluations<br />
Nothing improves performance like measurement, and evaluation forms are the most<br />
common yardstick for presenters. Many organizations that invite you <strong>to</strong> speak will<br />
provide evaluation forms for the audience, and in those cases, it’s up <strong>to</strong> you <strong>to</strong> contact the<br />
organizers after the event and ask for a copy of the results. (In my travels, I have never<br />
encountered a conference organizer who refused <strong>to</strong> share them, and in many cases they<br />
were provided before I had even asked for them.)<br />
When meeting planners have not covered this base – a question worth adding <strong>to</strong> your<br />
pre-presentation checklist – bring your own evaluation form. (As above, I have never<br />
encountered anyone who objected <strong>to</strong> this practice.) Audiences are no<strong>to</strong>riously impatient<br />
with long questionnaires, especially when they have <strong>to</strong> dash off <strong>to</strong> another session, so keep<br />
it short. In his book, Life is a Series of <strong>Presentations</strong>, Tony Jeary says evaluation forms should<br />
take a maximum of three <strong>to</strong> five minutes <strong>to</strong> complete. While brevity is your watchword,<br />
though, be sure <strong>to</strong> cover the basic categories:<br />
Category<br />
Clarity<br />
Relevance<br />
Length<br />
Interaction<br />
with presenter<br />
Interaction<br />
with audience<br />
Quality of visuals<br />
Quality of<br />
handouts<br />
Platform skills<br />
Sample Language for Evaluation Form<br />
Was the material presented in a clear and<br />
well-structured manner?<br />
Do you see ways <strong>to</strong> use the information presented<br />
in your work?<br />
Was the time allotted sufficient for the material<br />
covered?<br />
Did you have sufficient time <strong>to</strong> interact with<br />
the presenter?<br />
Did you have sufficient time <strong>to</strong> interact with other<br />
members of the audience?<br />
How would you rate the quality of any supporting<br />
visuals (e.g., PowerPoint)?<br />
How would you rate the quality of any handouts?<br />
Was the presenter effective in engaging the audience<br />
and making the subject matter compelling?<br />
See Checklists <strong>to</strong> Go<br />
for a detachable<br />
summary of this section.<br />
pg. 69