26.07.2013 Views

Final report - Integrated Land Management Bureau

Final report - Integrated Land Management Bureau

Final report - Integrated Land Management Bureau

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9.1 KEY MESSAGES<br />

Conclusion- Key messages<br />

1) Human well-being involves more than economic or material factors; it<br />

includes other factors such as health, education, culture and social<br />

processes. These factors interact with each other in complex feedback<br />

loops. Selection of indicators should reflect this broad definition of human<br />

well-being.<br />

2) To reflect the theories of human well-being, indicators can be framed in an<br />

“indicator framework” that is either selected or synthesized from the<br />

literature. There are many conceptual indicator frameworks currently in<br />

use by both practitioners and academics. None of the nine frameworks<br />

reviewed is recommended to be adopted “as is” for the North and Central<br />

Coasts; thus the set of recommended HWB components is a synthesis of<br />

the nine indicator frameworks based on dominant themes across all<br />

frameworks. There is no single “right” way to develop a monitoring<br />

framework.<br />

3) Selecting the criteria (“screening questions”) is nearly as important as the<br />

selection of the indicators themselves. It would be unfortunate if selected<br />

indicators don’t work because the criteria have not been carefully<br />

considered in advance, or if the criteria are debated after the fact.<br />

Involving community members and stakeholders in the development of<br />

criteria could be an important step in establishing buy-in for the indicators.<br />

4) There are serious limitations in the use of existing data for the North and<br />

Central Coast because the boundaries of the plan areas don’t closely match<br />

the boundaries of the existing sources, and because of the small<br />

populations in the plan areas that make data sets too small for meaningful<br />

comparisons over time.<br />

5) Despite higher costs of community-level primary data collection, it offers<br />

more reliable data that can be compared over time than most existing<br />

sources of data.<br />

6) While many sources of existing data are available annually, compiling<br />

them annually is unlikely to reveal meaningful trends. Compiling existing<br />

data every three to five years (and averaging across the years) is likely<br />

enough to show trends in most indicators, even if they are available<br />

annually.<br />

7) The advantage of this literature-driven (“expert driven”) approach for<br />

indicator selection is that it ensures a theoretical basis, but it lacks local<br />

perspective and community knowledge that may improve the selection of<br />

indicators. The most efficient and effective indicator selection processes<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!