26.07.2013 Views

Final report - Integrated Land Management Bureau

Final report - Integrated Land Management Bureau

Final report - Integrated Land Management Bureau

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Because of these limitations, the primary health indicators below are adopted from BC<br />

Stats, which makes the data available at the smallest scales- the Local Health Area. The<br />

secondary health indicators, “health behaviors,” are available only at the HSDA level.<br />

In some <strong>report</strong>s, the theoretical foundation for the selection of these indicators is plainly<br />

described. For other indicator sets, the research basis for the indicators is less clear.<br />

Implications for Schedule C and G: Despite the range of health indicators available in<br />

the literature and available from health agencies and organizations, there are few data that<br />

are measured at the appropriate geographic scale on a regular basis for the North and<br />

Central Coast. The BC Stats data are the only ones compiled on a regular basis at a small<br />

enough scale to be useful on the North and Central Coast, but even those indicators have<br />

limitations because of the small populations in the plan areas.<br />

4.4.3 Education<br />

All nine frameworks referred to education and/or human capital as key factors in human<br />

well-being. Human capital refers to the knowledge, skills, competencies, and attributes of<br />

individuals that facilitate the creation of personal, social and economic well-being. Many<br />

authors such as Cote (2001), Luther and Wall (1998), and Parkins et al. (2004) discuss<br />

human capital and a commitment to education as factors in well-being at the community<br />

scale. Veenstra (2001) has linked educational attainment with individual health<br />

indicators. Baum and Payea (2004) discuss the high correlations between education and<br />

higher earnings, as well as lower unemployment, poverty rates, smoking rates,<br />

incarceration rates, and levels of civic participation. They show that education has a high<br />

social and economic return on investment for students from all racial and ethnic groups,<br />

for both genders, and for those from all family backgrounds. Education results in higher<br />

tax revenues and lesser demands on social support programs. The Public Health Agency<br />

of Canada (PHAC, 2004) also found that health status improves with the level of<br />

education.<br />

Implications for Schedules C and G:<br />

There are currently no indicators in Schedules C and G to measure education. Given the<br />

importance of education in the literature as a factor linked to many other factors of HWB,<br />

the addition of education-related indicators is recommended.<br />

4.4.4 Economics<br />

There is little debate in the literature that material and economic well-being is a key<br />

factor in human well-being. All nine HWB frameworks included dimensions of<br />

economics such as living standards, income, housing, and livelihood security. Some<br />

indicators were measurable at an individual level, while others were measurable at a<br />

community scale. As discussed above, the literature links economics with many other<br />

factors, including social processes, health, and education in feedback loops that affect<br />

each other.<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!