26.07.2013 Views

Final report - Integrated Land Management Bureau

Final report - Integrated Land Management Bureau

Final report - Integrated Land Management Bureau

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Components of<br />

Human Well-being<br />

Primary measurable<br />

indicators<br />

Secondary<br />

measurable<br />

indicators<br />

E6 Numbers of<br />

hours of First<br />

Nation community<br />

member<br />

participation in the<br />

plan areas involved<br />

in traditional<br />

cultural activities<br />

E7 Percent of First<br />

Nations traditional<br />

territory covered by<br />

Traditional Use<br />

Studies within the<br />

plan area<br />

Found in<br />

Schedule<br />

C or G?<br />

No n/a<br />

Schedule C or G<br />

objective (if<br />

applicable)<br />

The following sections (5.1.1 through 5.1.5) discuss rationale, data sources, and desired<br />

direction for primary and secondary indicators. If there are costs for compiling existing<br />

data, an additional category for costs is also included. If costs only include staff time to<br />

look up data on line, costs are not included.<br />

5.1.1 Social processes<br />

PRIMARY INDICATORS<br />

Support networks (social capital)<br />

Indicator A1: Average index score for generalized trust (level of trust in people)<br />

Rationale: An increasing number of publications are recognizing social capital as<br />

a key factor in human well-being. Matthews et al. (2004) found that generalized<br />

trust can be used as a proxy for social capital.<br />

Data source: While there is growing literature identifying the link between social<br />

capital/sense of place and health and economic outcomes, there are no existing<br />

sources of social capital and sense of place data available for the North and<br />

Central Coasts. Primary data collection needs to be conducted (methods are<br />

outlined in Section 8.1).<br />

Desired direction: Increased average index score for generalized trust (level of<br />

trust in people).<br />

Identity with community as critical part of personal identity (sense of place)<br />

Indicator A2: Commitment to place (average scores on commitment-to-place survey<br />

question)<br />

Rationale: Results of research by Matthews et al. (2005) indicate that expressed<br />

‘willingness to stay in a community even if a good job came up elsewhere’ is a<br />

reliable indicator of sense of place (commitment to place) on the North and<br />

Central Coast.<br />

Data source: Primary data collection through a household survey<br />

No<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!