09.08.2013 Views

The evolution of professionalism - Centre for Policy Studies in ...

The evolution of professionalism - Centre for Policy Studies in ...

The evolution of professionalism - Centre for Policy Studies in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>g situation stimulated the emergence <strong>of</strong> an alternative system <strong>of</strong><br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g education fund<strong>in</strong>g at the local level. A parental lobby group, People<br />

<strong>for</strong> Education, was <strong>for</strong>med <strong>in</strong> the wake <strong>of</strong> Bill 160, and began carry<strong>in</strong>g out annual<br />

surveys <strong>of</strong> elementary and secondary education across the prov<strong>in</strong>ce. <strong>The</strong> surveys<br />

<strong>in</strong>quires about class size, support personnel and services, school libraries, textbook<br />

availability, school budgets, the fi nancial contributions <strong>of</strong> parents and teachers,<br />

and how these funds are used among other topics. <strong>The</strong> survey reports contradicted<br />

government claims that schools were adequately funded <strong>for</strong> required education<br />

programs and services, and revealed school-level fund<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>equities, such as<br />

wealthy communities hav<strong>in</strong>g greater capacity to supplement school funds.<br />

<strong>Policy</strong> Trends <strong>in</strong> Teacher Pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism<br />

<strong>The</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> the Ontario College <strong>of</strong> Teachers could be viewed as a signifi cant<br />

step towards teacher pr<strong>of</strong>essionalization. Perceived ga<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional autonomy<br />

and control, such as the development <strong>of</strong> Standards <strong>of</strong> Practice and responsibility<br />

<strong>for</strong> teacher education program accreditation, however, were <strong>of</strong>fset by government<br />

policies that superseded or constra<strong>in</strong>ed the College’s capacity to shape the<br />

nature and context <strong>of</strong> teacher pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism (e.g., the <strong>in</strong>itial certifi cation test,<br />

recertifi cation, and mandatory cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g education). While the Liberal government<br />

suspended the qualify<strong>in</strong>g test and repealed the re-certifi cation process adopted by<br />

the Conservatives, entry requirements beyond the B.Ed. and teacher recertifi cation<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>ed a focus <strong>of</strong> ongo<strong>in</strong>g policy debate.<br />

<strong>The</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> the OCT opened a rift <strong>in</strong> teacher leadership, as the College<br />

was granted powers that had been previously exercised by the teacher unions (e.g.,<br />

discipl<strong>in</strong>ary proceed<strong>in</strong>gs) and challenged the role <strong>of</strong> the unions as teachers’ chief<br />

spokesperson. Now the organizations co-exist, but they do not act as partners <strong>in</strong><br />

their deal<strong>in</strong>gs with teachers, school boards, and the M<strong>in</strong>istry. In terms <strong>of</strong> teacher<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism, it is also noteworthy that non-teachers appo<strong>in</strong>ted by the government<br />

to the OCT govern<strong>in</strong>g board outnumber certifi ed teachers elected by members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

college. <strong>The</strong> legislation govern<strong>in</strong>g the OCT came under review when the Liberals<br />

took power; by the end <strong>of</strong> 2004, however, it rema<strong>in</strong>ed unclear what, if any, changes<br />

might be made to teacher representation on the govern<strong>in</strong>g board.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce Bill 160, the role <strong>of</strong> the Ontario teacher federations became more restricted<br />

to labour advocacy. <strong>The</strong> Conservatives’ ef<strong>for</strong>ts to delimit union power through<br />

more centralized control and regulation <strong>of</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>g and work<strong>in</strong>g conditions resulted<br />

<strong>in</strong> a reduction <strong>in</strong> teacher autonomy that has not been <strong>of</strong>fset by the establishment <strong>of</strong><br />

the College <strong>of</strong> Teachers. While the Liberals adopted a more cooperative approach<br />

to work<strong>in</strong>g with organized teacher groups, they did not relax the more centralized<br />

controls over fund<strong>in</strong>g, work<strong>in</strong>g conditions, and barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g rights.<br />

Conclusion<br />

In this narrative, we have charted the major elementary and secondary education<br />

policy <strong>in</strong>itiatives undertaken by successive governments <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> Ontario<br />

from 1990-2004. In our description and analysis, we have attempted to show how<br />

certa<strong>in</strong> policy trends have persisted despite changes <strong>in</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial political leadership<br />

Chapter 5: Ontario 93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!