09.08.2013 Views

The evolution of professionalism - Centre for Policy Studies in ...

The evolution of professionalism - Centre for Policy Studies in ...

The evolution of professionalism - Centre for Policy Studies in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Policy</strong> required all students <strong>in</strong> Grades 5 to 8 to study a second language, which<br />

could <strong>in</strong>clude Punjabi, Mandar<strong>in</strong>, or Japanese. Aborig<strong>in</strong>al education enhancement<br />

agreements were developed <strong>in</strong> 1999. <strong>The</strong> francophone education regulation<br />

<strong>for</strong>malized the entitlement to enrol <strong>in</strong> francophone educational programs.<br />

In 1997, the M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Education made specifi c suggestions <strong>for</strong> the <strong>in</strong>clusion<br />

<strong>of</strong> multiculturalism and antiracism education <strong>in</strong> school curricula. An English as a<br />

Second Language policy framework was developed <strong>in</strong> 1999 and Diversity <strong>in</strong> BC<br />

Schools: A Framework was developed <strong>in</strong> 2001. Introductory Mandar<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />

and Introductory Punjabi are now <strong>of</strong>fered from Grades 5 to 12, and teachers have<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated resource packages <strong>for</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g language skills. While suggestions<br />

<strong>for</strong> curriculum and frameworks were developed prov<strong>in</strong>cially, implement<strong>in</strong>g these<br />

changes relied on <strong>in</strong>dividual school district priorities.<br />

Special education was acknowledged <strong>in</strong> the Royal Commission Report (1988)<br />

and the Commission recommended that the rights <strong>of</strong> learners with special needs<br />

and their parents required clarifi cation. As a result, Policies <strong>in</strong>to Practice <strong>in</strong>itiated<br />

a two-year guidel<strong>in</strong>e development process and an 18-month consultative process<br />

that resulted <strong>in</strong> a framework <strong>for</strong> special education policy (1995), with revised<br />

guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>for</strong> practice. A number <strong>of</strong> recommendations was made by a review team<br />

<strong>for</strong> implementation <strong>in</strong> 2001, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creased measures <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegration and <strong>for</strong><br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional development.<br />

Alongside these developments, we see the creation <strong>of</strong> the Francophone<br />

Education Authority (CSF: Conseil Scolaire Francophone) by the government<br />

<strong>in</strong> 1998. French education has been available to the francophone community <strong>in</strong><br />

BC s<strong>in</strong>ce 1979, and BC now has the fourth largest student population <strong>in</strong> French<br />

programs <strong>in</strong> Canada. A francophone school board was created <strong>in</strong> 1995 and, <strong>in</strong><br />

1997, the School Amendment Act (Bill 45) recognized the right to French-speak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

education. In 1998, 2,860 students were enrolled <strong>in</strong> francophone education<br />

programs, <strong>of</strong> which 1,800 participated <strong>in</strong> 11 districts governed by the CSF. In 1999,<br />

CSF’s jurisdiction was extended, and it was now entrusted with the management<br />

<strong>of</strong> the French-speak<strong>in</strong>g school programs throughout the prov<strong>in</strong>ce. In spr<strong>in</strong>g 2001,<br />

the Canada/BC General Agreement on the Promotion <strong>of</strong> Offi cial Languages was<br />

signed. <strong>The</strong> agreement provided a mandate <strong>for</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>cial government to<br />

coord<strong>in</strong>ate activities <strong>for</strong> the benefi t <strong>of</strong> the BC francophone population. Under the<br />

three-year agreement, the federal government provided the prov<strong>in</strong>cial government<br />

with $1,500,000. A Member <strong>of</strong> the Legislative Assembly (MLA) appo<strong>in</strong>tment (i.e.,<br />

MLA responsible <strong>for</strong>) was made to <strong>in</strong>clude and acknowledge the responsibility the<br />

government has <strong>for</strong> francophone affairs.<br />

Education <strong>Policy</strong> was directed toward <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g accountability. It recommended<br />

changes to written report cards, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g requirements that specifi c types <strong>of</strong><br />

anecdotal as well as quantitative commentary on student progress be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong><br />

these reports. <strong>The</strong>se changes were also implemented as a means to create a more<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>gful dialogue between schools and parents. <strong>The</strong> L<strong>in</strong>k File (1993) was also<br />

created. L<strong>in</strong>k data provided track<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms <strong>for</strong> students <strong>in</strong> the secondary<br />

through to the postsecondary system. <strong>The</strong> L<strong>in</strong>k File claimed to support a more<br />

effi cient use <strong>of</strong> education resources, and suggested that equitable access must be<br />

provided to students to public postsecondary <strong>in</strong>stitutions.<br />

18 Section 1: <strong>The</strong> West

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!