09.08.2013 Views

The evolution of professionalism - Centre for Policy Studies in ...

The evolution of professionalism - Centre for Policy Studies in ...

The evolution of professionalism - Centre for Policy Studies in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

schools. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the last section exam<strong>in</strong>es policies connected with the language <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>struction and the tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>of</strong> ethno-cultural diversity. In conclusion,<br />

we take up the question perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to the variability <strong>of</strong> the quality and nature <strong>of</strong><br />

Quebec’s engagement <strong>in</strong> education dur<strong>in</strong>g the decade studied. Tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account<br />

the large body <strong>of</strong> educational policies and our limited space, this work rema<strong>in</strong>s a<br />

partial but nonetheless important socio-history <strong>of</strong> recent educational policies.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Evolution <strong>of</strong> Education F<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

For the past twenty years, Quebec has systematically spent a larger proportion<br />

<strong>of</strong> its gross domestic product (GDP) on education than have Canada or the United<br />

States. In 2001-02, Quebec’s global spend<strong>in</strong>g relative to education was estimated<br />

as 7.5 percent <strong>of</strong> the GDP, compared to 6.4 percent <strong>in</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> Canada and 7.4<br />

percent <strong>in</strong> the United States. <strong>The</strong> fi nanc<strong>in</strong>g was divided as follows: <strong>The</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

government accounted <strong>for</strong> 68.8 percent <strong>of</strong> global education spend<strong>in</strong>g, the federal<br />

government 8.3 percent, and local government 6.1 percent, while 16.8 percent came<br />

from other sources. By exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g government spend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> three major program<br />

areas (education; health and social Services; employment, social solidarity, and<br />

family), we may better understand the <strong>evolution</strong> <strong>of</strong> education fund<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Throughout most <strong>of</strong> the 1990s, budget cuts led to a decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> the proportion<br />

<strong>of</strong> total program spend<strong>in</strong>g allocated to the education sector. In 1992-93, education<br />

received 28.6 percent <strong>of</strong> total program spend<strong>in</strong>g; by 1998-99, that percentage had<br />

dropped to 25.2 percent. Between 1998 and 2003, the portion <strong>of</strong> program spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

allocated to education varied only slightly, and was 25.1 percent <strong>in</strong> 2003-04 (a total<br />

<strong>of</strong> approximately $11.5 billion); <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> actual dollars, however, the amount<br />

spent on education rose by $1.9 billion between 1998-99 and 2003-04, an <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

<strong>of</strong> 20 percent.<br />

Global spend<strong>in</strong>g on education, expressed as a percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP, decreased at<br />

all teach<strong>in</strong>g levels between 1994-95 and 2001-02. <strong>The</strong> elementary and secondary<br />

levels showed the most signifi cant drop, go<strong>in</strong>g from 4.8 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP <strong>in</strong> 1994-95<br />

to 3.9 percent <strong>in</strong> 2001-02. Overall education spend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> the college level went<br />

from 1.1 percent <strong>in</strong> 1994-95 to 0.9 percent <strong>in</strong> 2001-02. <strong>The</strong> university level received<br />

1.7 percent <strong>of</strong> the GDP <strong>in</strong> overall education spend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2001-02, compared to<br />

1.9 percent <strong>in</strong> 1994-95. Other areas received 0.9 percent <strong>of</strong> the GDP <strong>in</strong> overall<br />

education spend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2001-02, which represents an <strong>in</strong>crease from 1994-95 (0.7<br />

percent). In 2001-02, Quebec dedicated a similar portion <strong>of</strong> its GDP to elementary<br />

and secondary teach<strong>in</strong>g (3.9 percent) as did the rest <strong>of</strong> Canada (3.7 percent) and<br />

the United States (4.5 percent). However, historically, the part <strong>of</strong> the GDP given<br />

to elementary and secondary teach<strong>in</strong>g has dim<strong>in</strong>ished <strong>in</strong> Quebec, go<strong>in</strong>g from 6.6<br />

percent <strong>in</strong> 1976-77 to 4.4 percent <strong>in</strong> 1989-90, while it has rema<strong>in</strong>ed rather stable<br />

<strong>in</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> Canada. <strong>The</strong> school boards’ functional spend<strong>in</strong>g by student <strong>in</strong> 2001-<br />

02 stayed slightly higher <strong>in</strong> Quebec ($7,117) as compared to the rest <strong>of</strong> Canada<br />

($6,870) but was lower than <strong>in</strong> the United States ($9,282).<br />

100 Section 3: Central Canada

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!