09.08.2013 Views

The evolution of professionalism - Centre for Policy Studies in ...

The evolution of professionalism - Centre for Policy Studies in ...

The evolution of professionalism - Centre for Policy Studies in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Policies <strong>in</strong>to Practice developed specifi c <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>for</strong> accreditation, annual<br />

reports and policy. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>tent was to make the system more accountable through the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> more transparent categories. <strong>The</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry’s annual reports were redesigned<br />

to make them more accessible to the public. If one compares the descriptors <strong>in</strong> the<br />

three reports 1995-96, 1996-97, and 1997-98 an attempt to achieve this objective<br />

can be seen. In general, the M<strong>in</strong>istry and school districts were required to produce<br />

more evaluative <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation. A review <strong>of</strong> fi nance fund<strong>in</strong>g was underway and<br />

this review exam<strong>in</strong>ed fi nancial <strong>in</strong>centives to “encourage <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> services”.<br />

This <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>in</strong>volved revised account<strong>in</strong>g manuals and policies and procedure<br />

manuals. Accountability and per<strong>for</strong>mance cont<strong>in</strong>ued to be refl ected <strong>in</strong> annual<br />

reviews and <strong>in</strong> two report card documents (an evaluation <strong>of</strong> the secondary system)<br />

produced by the Fraser Institute (1998, 1999).<br />

<strong>The</strong> BCSTA produced a discussion paper entitled Our Children, Our<br />

Responsibility (1997). This paper is a framework <strong>for</strong> clarify<strong>in</strong>g the roles and<br />

responsibilities <strong>of</strong> school boards and the M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Education. <strong>The</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>ce has<br />

responsibility <strong>for</strong> “fund<strong>in</strong>g to allow students across the prov<strong>in</strong>ce to have equitable<br />

access to appropriate m<strong>in</strong>imum standard <strong>of</strong> programs and services <strong>in</strong> keep<strong>in</strong>g with<br />

the mandate spelled out <strong>in</strong> the legislative framework” (page 5). <strong>The</strong> paper suggests<br />

that an accountability framework <strong>for</strong> education requires further development. <strong>The</strong><br />

recommendations are consistent with the current thrust <strong>in</strong> government policy to give<br />

boards greater <strong>in</strong>dependence and thereby create more local autonomy and <strong>in</strong>itiative.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, Policies <strong>in</strong>to Practice emphasized safety and policies to be developed<br />

regard<strong>in</strong>g at-risk children and violence <strong>in</strong> schools. A mandatory screen<strong>in</strong>g program<br />

was implemented <strong>for</strong> staff that would be work<strong>in</strong>g with children <strong>in</strong> governmentfunded<br />

organizations. This was the fi rst <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> programs designed to<br />

address school safety, prompted by the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g visibility <strong>of</strong> violence <strong>in</strong> schools.<br />

<strong>The</strong> most prom<strong>in</strong>ent <strong>in</strong>itiatives were developed to address bully<strong>in</strong>g. A BC safe<br />

schools <strong>in</strong>itiative produced a manual, Focus on Bully<strong>in</strong>g: A Prevention Program<br />

<strong>for</strong> Elementary School Communities <strong>in</strong> 1999. <strong>The</strong> BCTF have also supported<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigations regard<strong>in</strong>g violence <strong>in</strong> schools and violence directed towards<br />

teachers (Malcolmson, 1994; Lyon and Douglas, 1999). In 2003, the M<strong>in</strong>ster<br />

<strong>of</strong> Education announced that the government would require new prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

standards <strong>for</strong> school codes <strong>of</strong> conduct, and that school boards will be required<br />

to report annually on the number and type <strong>of</strong> violent <strong>in</strong>cidents <strong>in</strong> the schools<br />

and how these <strong>in</strong>cidents have been addressed. All school boards have codes <strong>of</strong><br />

student conduct, as required by the School Act.<br />

<strong>The</strong> New Era <strong>in</strong> Education<br />

After a crush<strong>in</strong>g electoral defeat that left only two members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>for</strong>mer NDP<br />

government sitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Legislative Assembly, a Liberal adm<strong>in</strong>istration assumed<br />

<strong>of</strong>fi ce on June 5, 2001, under Premier Gordon Campbell. <strong>The</strong> Liberal campaign<br />

was vague, promis<strong>in</strong>g to build a “new era <strong>of</strong> hope and prosperity” by cutt<strong>in</strong>g red<br />

tape, revitaliz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestment and creat<strong>in</strong>g jobs. <strong>The</strong>ir plat<strong>for</strong>m emphasized fi scal<br />

responsibility, <strong>in</strong>tegrity, reduced taxes, and a reduced defi cit. After follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

through on the promise to reduce taxes, the government’s budget, released February<br />

Chapter 1: British Columbia 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!