Powering Europe - European Wind Energy Association
Powering Europe - European Wind Energy Association
Powering Europe - European Wind Energy Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
fiGURE 10: total ElECtRiCity DEManD assUMED in thE MoDEllinG analysis<br />
Total demand [TWh/a]<br />
4,000<br />
3,500<br />
3,000<br />
2,500<br />
2,000<br />
1,500<br />
1,000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
3,348<br />
2008<br />
Figure 9 depicts the investments the Classic Carbon<br />
model is simulating in order to meet the scenarios’<br />
power demand. Investments are made in accordance<br />
with long-term marginal costs. In a perfect market, the<br />
model will invest in the least expensive technology as<br />
long as the expected power price exceeds the longterm<br />
marginal costs.<br />
It can be seen above that endogenous investments<br />
only take place for conventional lignite, coal and<br />
gas technologies 13 . For both scenarios, most of the<br />
future investments will be in coal. For most of the<br />
countries, the Reference scenario requires more investment<br />
than the <strong>Wind</strong> scenario. This is because<br />
with power demand increasing from 2008 to 2020<br />
by more than 400 TWh/a (see Figure 10), the older<br />
capacities are phased out and additional new capacities<br />
are needed in order to meet demand. The <strong>Wind</strong><br />
scenario reduces the need for conventional investments.<br />
(For the model’s detailed long run marginal<br />
cost assumptions, see Annex 1).<br />
13 “Endogenous” investments mean investments which are a model result. They are simulated by the model in order to balance supply<br />
with demand. In comparison, the model also includes “policy based” investments which are forced into the model as input assumption,<br />
e.g. known shut downs and known investment projects already under construction.<br />
chApTEr 6 themeritordereffectoflarge-scalewindintegration<br />
Total demand<br />
3,754<br />
3,860<br />
Reference 2020 <strong>Wind</strong> 2020<br />
However, in most countries, wind investments alone<br />
are not sufficient to cover demand, and additional conventional<br />
investments take place. Usually, investment<br />
in conventional power generation technologies are<br />
higher in the Reference than in the <strong>Wind</strong> scenario, except<br />
for in the Czech Republic and Slovenia. Here, obviously,<br />
the extremely high investments in wind power<br />
in the <strong>Wind</strong> scenario require additional base-load capacity<br />
investments. Consequently, investment in coal<br />
is higher in the <strong>Wind</strong> than in the Reference scenario<br />
for these countries.<br />
The investment developments described above include<br />
peak capacity developments. The Classic Carbon<br />
model includes volatile generation profiles for different<br />
technologies, for example for wind power. For<br />
each period over the year a statistical wind profile is<br />
used to simulate wind power generation. As a consequence,<br />
the model might also invest in peak capacities,<br />
mainly gas turbines, in order to supply peak demand<br />
if necessary.<br />
151