13.08.2013 Views

Powering Europe - European Wind Energy Association

Powering Europe - European Wind Energy Association

Powering Europe - European Wind Energy Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

alancingdemand,conventionalgenerationandwindpower<br />

fiGURE 3: balanCinG anD oPERatinG Costs DUE to winD PowER as fUnCtion of winD EnERGy PEnEtRation<br />

The main contributing factors to lower balancing<br />

costs are:<br />

• larger areas: Large balancing areas offer the benefits<br />

of lower variability. They also help decrease the<br />

amount of forecast errors in wind power forecasts,<br />

and thus reduce the amount of unforeseen imbalance.<br />

Large areas favour the pooling of more costeffective<br />

balancing resources. In this respect, the<br />

regional aggregation of power markets in <strong>Europe</strong> is<br />

expected to improve the economics of wind energy<br />

integration. Additional and better interconnection is<br />

the key to enlarging balancing areas. Certainly, improved<br />

interconnection will bring benefits for wind<br />

power integration, as explained in Chapter 2.<br />

• Reducing gate-closure times: This means operating<br />

the power system close to the delivery hour. For example,<br />

a re-dispatch, based on a 4–6 hour forecast<br />

update, would lower the costs of integrating wind<br />

72<br />

Euros/MWh wind<br />

4.5<br />

4<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

Increase in balancing cost<br />

0<br />

0% 5% 10% -15% 20% 25% 30%<br />

<strong>Wind</strong> penetration [% of gross demand]<br />

Nordic 2004<br />

Finland 2004<br />

UK 2002<br />

UK 2007<br />

Ireland<br />

Colorado US<br />

Minnesota 2004<br />

Minnesota 2006<br />

California US<br />

Pasicorp US<br />

Greennet Germany<br />

Greennet Finland<br />

Greennet Norwy<br />

Greennet Sweden<br />

Greennet Denmark<br />

for the Uk’s 2007 study, the average cost is presented here, the range in the last point for 20% penetration level is<br />

from €2.6 to 4.7/Mwh (iEa task 25 final report) 3 .<br />

3 The currency conversion: €1 = £0.7 and €1 = US$1.3<br />

power, compared to scheduling based on only dayahead<br />

forecasts. In this respect the emergence of<br />

intra-day markets will facilitate larger amounts of<br />

wind energy in the system – see Chapter 4.<br />

• improving the efficiency of the forecast systems:<br />

Balancing costs would be decreased if wind power<br />

forecast accuracy was improved, leaving only small<br />

deviations in the rest of the power system. Experience<br />

from different countries (Germany, Spain and<br />

Ireland), shows that the accuracy of the forecast<br />

has been improved in several ways, ranging from<br />

improvements in meteorological data supply to the<br />

use of ensemble predictions and combined forecasting.<br />

In the latter two, the quality of the forecast<br />

is improved by making a balanced combination of<br />

different data sources and methods in the prediction<br />

process (see also Chapter 2, section 1).<br />

<strong>Powering</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>: wind energy and the electricity grid

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!