36 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen Davidsson, P. and Wiklund, J. (2000) ‘Conceptual and empirical challenges <strong>in</strong> the study of firm growth’, <strong>in</strong> D.L. Sexton and H. Landström (Eds.): Blackwell Handbook of Entrepreneurship, pp.26–44, Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford. Davidsson, P. and Wiklund, J. (2001) ‘Levels of analysis <strong>in</strong> entrepreneurship research: current research practice and suggestions for the future’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp.81–99. Davidsson, P., Steffens, P. and Fitzsimmons, J. (2009) ‘ Grow<strong>in</strong>g profitable or grow<strong>in</strong>g from profits: putt<strong>in</strong>g the horse <strong>in</strong> front of the chart?’, Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Ventur<strong>in</strong>g, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp.388–406. Delmar, F. (1997) ‘Measur<strong>in</strong>g growth: methodological considerations and empirical results <strong>in</strong> entrepreneurship and SME research’, <strong>in</strong> Donckels, R. and Miett<strong>in</strong>en, A. (Eds.): On its Way to the Next Millenium, pp.199–216. Delmar, F., Davidsson, P. and Gartner, W.B. (2003) ‘Arriv<strong>in</strong>g at the high-growth firm’, Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Ventur<strong>in</strong>g, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp.189–216. Ettl<strong>in</strong>ger, N. and Tufford, M. (1996) ‘Evaluat<strong>in</strong>g small firm performance <strong>in</strong> local context: a case study of manufacturers <strong>in</strong> Columbus, Ohio’, Small Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Economics, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp.139–157. Fabl<strong>in</strong>g, R.B. and Grimes, A. (2007) ‘Practise make profit: bus<strong>in</strong>ess practices and firm success’, Small Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Economics, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp.383–399. Glancey, K. (1998) ‘Determ<strong>in</strong>ants of growth and profitability <strong>in</strong> small entrepreneurial firms’, Int. J. of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp.18–27. Heimonen, T. (2012) ‘What are the factors that affect <strong>in</strong>novation <strong>in</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g SMEs?’, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp.xxx–xxx. Heimonen, T. and Virtanen, M. (2007) ‘The characteristics of fast growth and highly successful firms <strong>in</strong> rural and urban areas’, Paper presented <strong>in</strong> RENT XXI Conference, 22–23 November, Cardiff, UK. Hoetker, G. (2007) ‘The use of logit and probit models <strong>in</strong> strategic management research: critical issues’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp.331–343. Kirby, J. (2005) ‘Toward a theory of high performance’, Harward Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review, Vol. 83, No. 7, pp.30–39. Littunen, H. and Tohmo, T. (2003) ‘The high growth <strong>in</strong> new metal-based manufactur<strong>in</strong>g and bus<strong>in</strong>ess service firms <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land’, Small Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Economics, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp.187–200. Littunen, H. and Virtanen, M. (2006) ‘Differentiat<strong>in</strong>g grow<strong>in</strong>g ventures from non-growth firms’, Int. J. of Entrepreneurship and Management, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp.93–109. Littunen, H., and Virtanen, M. (2009) ‘Differentiat<strong>in</strong>g factors of venture growth: from statics to dynamics’, Int. J. of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp.535–554. Low, M.B. and MacMillan, I.C. (1988) ‘Entrepreneurship: past research and future challenges’, Journal of Management, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp.139–161. Lussier, R.N. and Corman, J. (1995) ‘There are few differences between successful and failed small bus<strong>in</strong>esses’, Journal of Small Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Strategy, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp.21–33. Markman, G.D. and Gartner, W.B. (2002) ‘Is extraord<strong>in</strong>ary growth profitable? A study of <strong>in</strong>c. 500 high-growth companies’, Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp.65–75. Moreno, A.M. and Casillas, J.C. (2007) ‘High-growth SMEs versus non-high-growth SMEs: a discrim<strong>in</strong>ant analysis’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp.69–88. North, D. and Smallbone, D. (2000) ‘The <strong>in</strong>novativeness and growth of rural SMEs dur<strong>in</strong>g 1990s’, Regional Studies, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp.145–157. Parker, S.C., Storey, D. and Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2010) ‘What happens to gazelles? The importance of dynamic management strategy’, Small Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Economics, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp.203–226.
Characteristics of successful gazelles 37 Pasanen, M. (2003) ‘In search of factors affect<strong>in</strong>g SME performance, the case of Eastern F<strong>in</strong>land’, PhD <strong>dissertation</strong>, Kuopio University Publications H, Bus<strong>in</strong>ess and In<strong>format</strong>ion Technology 1. P<strong>in</strong>dyck, R.S. and Rub<strong>in</strong>field, D.L. (1976) Econometric Models and Econometric Forecasts, McGraw-Hill, Inc, New York, USA. Sexton, D., Pricer, R.W. and Nenide, B. (2000) ‘Measur<strong>in</strong>g performance <strong>in</strong> high growth firms’, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the Twentieth Annual Entrepreneurship Conference, Babson College, MA. Siegel, R., Siegel, E. and MacMillan, I. (1993) ‘Characteristics dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g high-growth ventures’, Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Ventur<strong>in</strong>g, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp.169–180. Smallbone, D., Leigh, R. and North, D. (1995) ‘The characteristics and strategies of fast growth SMEs’, Int. J. of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp.44–62. Steffens, P., Davidsson, P. and Fitzsimmons, J. (2009) ‘Performance configurations over time: implications for growth- and profit-oriented strategies’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp.125–148. Suomen Asiakastieto Oy (2006–2008) Data base: ‘Voitto+, CD-rom’, The Newest F<strong>in</strong>ancial Statements Data of 101 000 F<strong>in</strong>nish Companies and Groups. Tabachnik, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. (2007) Us<strong>in</strong>g Multivariate Statistics, 5th ed., Pearson International Edition, California State University, Northridge, USA. Veronique, A., Schutjens, J.M. and Wever, E. (2000) ‘Determ<strong>in</strong>ants of new firm success’, Regional Science, Vol. 79, No. 2, pp.135–159. Virtanen, M. and Heimonen, T. (2007) ‘Comparative analysis of fast grow<strong>in</strong>g and highly successful firms <strong>in</strong> urban and rural areas’, Paper presented <strong>in</strong> 52nd ICSB World Conference, 13–15 June, Turku, F<strong>in</strong>land. Virtanen, M. and Heimonen, T. (2011) ‘The development of high growth and highly successful SMEs: cases from Eastern F<strong>in</strong>land’, Int. J. Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, Vol. 10, Nos. 3/4, pp.411–432. We<strong>in</strong>zimmer, L.G., Nystron, P.C. and Freeman, S.J. (1998) ‘Measur<strong>in</strong>g organizational growth: Issues, consequences and guidel<strong>in</strong>es’, Journal of Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp.235–262. Wiklund, J. (1998) ‘Small firm growth and performance. Entrepreneurship and beyond’, PhD <strong>dissertation</strong>, Jonkop<strong>in</strong>g International Bus<strong>in</strong>ess School, Jonkop<strong>in</strong>g, Sweden. Wiklund, J., Patzelt, H. and Shepherd, D.A. (2009) ‘Build<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>tegrative model of small bus<strong>in</strong>ess growth’, Small Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Economics, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp.351–374. Notes 1 NUTS – The Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics, available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/nuts/<strong>in</strong>troduction_regions_en.html. 2 We have used the average figures from the period 2003–2005.
- Page 3 and 4:
Aalto University publication series
- Page 5:
Author Tomi Heimonen Name of the do
- Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgements This dissertation
- Page 11 and 12:
CONTENTS PART 1: Overview of the di
- Page 13:
List of Articles This thesis is bas
- Page 16 and 17:
1 Introduction Some scholars claim
- Page 18 and 19:
1 Introduction In addition, the dur
- Page 20 and 21:
1 Introduction Figure 1: Framework
- Page 22 and 23:
1 Introduction factors that affect
- Page 24 and 25:
1 Introduction 1.4 Key concepts and
- Page 26 and 27:
2 Literature review and conceptual
- Page 28 and 29:
2 Literature review and conceptual
- Page 30 and 31:
2 Literature review and conceptual
- Page 32 and 33:
2 Literature review and conceptual
- Page 34 and 35:
2 Literature review and conceptual
- Page 36 and 37:
2 Literature review and conceptual
- Page 38 and 39:
2 Literature review and conceptual
- Page 40 and 41:
2 Literature review and conceptual
- Page 42 and 43:
2 Literature review and conceptual
- Page 44 and 45:
2 Literature review and conceptual
- Page 46 and 47:
3 Research methodology Constructivi
- Page 48 and 49:
3 Research methodology and the meth
- Page 50 and 51:
3 Research methodology The data use
- Page 52 and 53:
3 Research methodology 3.4 Models a
- Page 54 and 55:
3 Research methodology reliable. Se
- Page 56 and 57:
3 Research methodology concluded th
- Page 58 and 59:
4 Results, evaluation of the studie
- Page 60 and 61:
4 Results, evaluation of the studie
- Page 62 and 63:
4 Results, evaluation of the studie
- Page 64 and 65:
4 Results, evaluation of the studie
- Page 66 and 67:
4 Results, evaluation of the studie
- Page 68 and 69:
4 Results, evaluation of the studie
- Page 70 and 71:
References Abetti, P. A. (2001). Ac
- Page 72 and 73:
References Bhide, A. (2000). The or
- Page 74 and 75:
References Creswell, J. W. (2003).
- Page 76 and 77:
References Golafshani, N. (2003). U
- Page 78 and 79:
References Leitch, C., Hill, F., an
- Page 80 and 81:
References Pellikka, J. and Laurone
- Page 82 and 83:
References Storper, M. (1992). The
- Page 84 and 85:
Appendixes Overview: Appendix 1: Ke
- Page 86 and 87:
Appendixes High growth When examini
- Page 88 and 89:
Appendixes profitability, liquidity
- Page 90 and 91:
Appendixes Appendix 1 Continued (Ke
- Page 92 and 93:
Appendixes Appendix 2 Construction
- Page 94 and 95:
Appendixes Appendix 2 Continued (Co
- Page 96 and 97:
not increased compared to Eastern F
- Page 98 and 99:
___________________________________
- Page 100 and 101:
propensity for risk taking (Covin a
- Page 102 and 103: 2. Former studies and derivation of
- Page 104 and 105: firm’s annual sales growth (Arund
- Page 106 and 107: H4. Firm success has an impact on t
- Page 108 and 109: other branches in which employment
- Page 110 and 111: and Rao, 2008). Because of the unev
- Page 112 and 113: Table 1. Characteristics of the dat
- Page 114 and 115: firms from other firms. The data in
- Page 116 and 117: Table 2. Logistic Regression analys
- Page 118 and 119: Public R&D funding was shown to inc
- Page 120 and 121: References Achtenhagen, L., Naldi,
- Page 122 and 123: Kanter, R. (1985), “Supporting in
- Page 124 and 125: Appendix 1. Corporate population ch
- Page 126 and 127: Appendix 3. Distribution of personn
- Page 128 and 129: 12 Int. J. Business and Globalisati
- Page 130 and 131: 14 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen we u
- Page 132 and 133: 16 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen suff
- Page 134 and 135: 18 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen Glan
- Page 136 and 137: 20 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen 3.2.
- Page 138 and 139: 22 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen diff
- Page 140 and 141: 24 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen sepa
- Page 142 and 143: 26 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen Tabl
- Page 144 and 145: 28 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen All
- Page 146 and 147: 30 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen 5.2
- Page 148 and 149: 32 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen Tabl
- Page 150 and 151: 34 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen The
- Page 154 and 155: 38 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen Appe
- Page 156 and 157: 40 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen 100
- Page 158 and 159: ___________________________________
- Page 160 and 161: 412 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen “
- Page 162 and 163: 414 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen gro
- Page 164 and 165: 416 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen 6 f
- Page 166 and 167: 418 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen Fig
- Page 168 and 169: 420 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen The
- Page 170 and 171: 422 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen the
- Page 172 and 173: 424 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen 4.6
- Page 174 and 175: 426 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen exc
- Page 176 and 177: 428 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen Dav
- Page 178 and 179: 430 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen The
- Page 180 and 181: 432 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen Cha
- Page 182 and 183: 392 Int. J. Entrepreneurial Venturi
- Page 184 and 185: 394 J. Siikonen et al. firms’ gro
- Page 186 and 187: 396 J. Siikonen et al. generally re
- Page 188 and 189: 398 J. Siikonen et al. determinants
- Page 190 and 191: 400 J. Siikonen et al. 3.1 National
- Page 192 and 193: 402 J. Siikonen et al. 2 the firm
- Page 194 and 195: 404 J. Siikonen et al. 4 Results 4.
- Page 196 and 197: 406 J. Siikonen et al. innovation a
- Page 198 and 199: 408 J. Siikonen et al. the responde
- Page 200 and 201: 410 J. Siikonen et al. activities i
- Page 202 and 203:
412 J. Siikonen et al. Eastern Finl
- Page 204 and 205:
414 J. Siikonen et al. Delmar, F.,
- Page 206 and 207:
416 J. Siikonen et al. Oerlemans, L
- Page 208 and 209:
418 J. Siikonen et al. Appendix 1 V
- Page 211:
9HSTFMG*afacab+