17.08.2013 Views

dissertation in pdf-format - Aalto-yliopisto

dissertation in pdf-format - Aalto-yliopisto

dissertation in pdf-format - Aalto-yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

394 J. Siikonen et al.<br />

firms’ growth <strong>in</strong> the regional context, but there has been little research regard<strong>in</strong>g the k<strong>in</strong>d<br />

of support that is needed and how it should be provided (Blakely, 1994; Klofsten and<br />

Jones-Evans, 1996). This paper assesses the support required by fast-growth firms <strong>in</strong><br />

Eastern F<strong>in</strong>land. Such firms are here def<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g essentially the def<strong>in</strong>ition of ‘gazelles’<br />

presented by Birch (1979): “A gazelle firm has to grow at least 20% a year for four years,<br />

from a base of at least $100.000 <strong>in</strong> revenues, thus at least doubl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> size over that<br />

four-year period”. However, <strong>in</strong> this paper the timeframe applied <strong>in</strong> the def<strong>in</strong>ition for<br />

doubl<strong>in</strong>g revenues is different (three years). In addition, West and Farr’s (1990) broad<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ition of the term ‘<strong>in</strong>novation’ is adopted: “the <strong>in</strong>tentional <strong>in</strong>troduction and<br />

application with<strong>in</strong> a role, group or organisation of ideas, processes, products or<br />

procedures, new to the relevant unit of adoption, designed to significantly benefit the<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual, the group, organisation or wider society.”<br />

This paper exam<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> detail the bus<strong>in</strong>ess requirements of small, high-growth<br />

technology firms that are not fully met by regional <strong>in</strong>novation support services, to<br />

ascerta<strong>in</strong> ways <strong>in</strong> which the services should be adjusted to enhance the overall growth of<br />

small firms, especially small knowledge-<strong>in</strong>tensive technology firms <strong>in</strong> Eastern F<strong>in</strong>land. In<br />

order to do so, the follow<strong>in</strong>g question was addressed: What enhancements to regional<br />

<strong>in</strong>novation support services can regional policy-makers and economic developers make<br />

to foster the overall growth of small firms?<br />

However, <strong>in</strong> order to answer this question, the follow<strong>in</strong>g subsidiary questions first<br />

had to be addressed: What are the fast grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustrial branches <strong>in</strong> Eastern F<strong>in</strong>land?<br />

What characteristics dist<strong>in</strong>guish firms <strong>in</strong> fast-grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustrial branches from those <strong>in</strong><br />

other branches? What do these small firms require from regional <strong>in</strong>novation support<br />

services?<br />

In order to address these questions, the study is organised as follows. The second<br />

section discusses previous literature related to the role of high-growth firms and<br />

entrepreneurship <strong>in</strong> the F<strong>in</strong>nish economy, describes dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g characteristics of the<br />

identified fast growth sectors, presents background <strong>in</strong><strong>format</strong>ion regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novation<br />

support services (ISS) targeted for small technology-<strong>in</strong>tensive KIBS firms and reviews<br />

the potential benefits they can provide. Section 3 describes the methodology and data<br />

acquired, the results are presented <strong>in</strong> Section 4 and f<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>in</strong> Section 5, conclusions and<br />

implications of the results are discussed.<br />

2 Support<strong>in</strong>g high-growth small firms<br />

Ideally, policy-makers and <strong>in</strong>vestors should dist<strong>in</strong>guish between SMEs (which are key<br />

components of Europe’s economy) that will stay small and those that will grow, because<br />

although entrepreneurship is a major focus of <strong>in</strong>dustrial policy it is rare. For example, <strong>in</strong><br />

F<strong>in</strong>land, the median size of new firms surveyed by Hyvär<strong>in</strong>en and Rautia<strong>in</strong>en (2006)<br />

three years after their start-up was one, i.e., the average firm employed only the focal<br />

entrepreneur. Further, most new firms will never employ anyone other than the founder,<br />

and the owners of only 7% of F<strong>in</strong>nish firms surveyed by the former F<strong>in</strong>nish M<strong>in</strong>istry of<br />

Trade and Industry wanted their firms to grow (KTM, 2004). Various studies have also<br />

shown that most firms do not <strong>in</strong>novate <strong>in</strong> the sense of develop<strong>in</strong>g new products and<br />

technologies or conquer<strong>in</strong>g new markets. Most bus<strong>in</strong>esses operate <strong>in</strong> their local market<br />

and often focus on small-scale provision of services or trad<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> well-established or even

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!