17.08.2013 Views

dissertation in pdf-format - Aalto-yliopisto

dissertation in pdf-format - Aalto-yliopisto

dissertation in pdf-format - Aalto-yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

404 J. Siikonen et al.<br />

4 Results<br />

4.1 Dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g characteristics of the high-growth sectors compared to other<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustrial branches<br />

In order to address the ma<strong>in</strong> research question, we first discuss the results regard<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

previously presented sub-questions (i.e., acquired <strong>in</strong><strong>format</strong>ion on the branches of <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

that grew rapidly <strong>in</strong> Eastern F<strong>in</strong>land <strong>in</strong> the study period, and their dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

characteristics relative to other branches of <strong>in</strong>dustries with grow<strong>in</strong>g firms). We found that<br />

the services sector was the only fast-growth branch of <strong>in</strong>dustry dur<strong>in</strong>g the period 2002 to<br />

2005 <strong>in</strong> Eastern F<strong>in</strong>land. In addition, we identified several factors that may differentiate<br />

the service sector, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g KIBS growth firms, from the growth firms <strong>in</strong> other sectors,<br />

such as trade, manufactur<strong>in</strong>g, construction, transportation and telecommunication.<br />

The results presented <strong>in</strong> Table 2 show the overall distribution of growth firms<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to their branch of <strong>in</strong>dustry among the firms considered. Not all firms were<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the Logistic regression analyses (LR-analyses) because there were fewer<br />

services firms (216) than firms represent<strong>in</strong>g other branches (350). This imbalance, <strong>in</strong> the<br />

absence of appropriate adjustment, would have led to bias regard<strong>in</strong>g the role and<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence of the larger group <strong>in</strong> LR-analysis. Therefore, we <strong>in</strong>cluded only part of the data<br />

regard<strong>in</strong>g other <strong>in</strong>dustry branches <strong>in</strong> the LR-analysis, and used the rema<strong>in</strong>der of the other<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry data for cross-validation of the results, i.e., to assess the validity and reliability<br />

of the results. Hence, 433 firms were <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the analysis, 133 firms def<strong>in</strong>ed as other<br />

branch of <strong>in</strong>dustry firms were used <strong>in</strong> the cross-validation (and one firm for which data<br />

for some variables were miss<strong>in</strong>g was excluded). Both an Omnibus test of model<br />

coefficients and a Hosmer and Lemeshow test of correct classification (p > 0.05)<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicated that the model can reliably differentiate services growth firms from growth<br />

firms represent<strong>in</strong>g other branches of <strong>in</strong>dustry (e.g., trade, manufactur<strong>in</strong>g, construction<br />

and transportation/telecommunication).<br />

We also used b<strong>in</strong>ary logistic analysis <strong>in</strong> an attempt to identify common characteristics<br />

of the fast-growth KIBS firms <strong>in</strong> a specific rural area (Eastern F<strong>in</strong>land). For this purpose<br />

we first studied variables and factors capable of differentiat<strong>in</strong>g services firms from firms<br />

represent<strong>in</strong>g other branches of <strong>in</strong>dustry (us<strong>in</strong>g the b<strong>in</strong>ary classification system described<br />

above). The <strong>in</strong>dependent variables and factors that were found to be statistically<br />

significant differentiators <strong>in</strong> the model were:<br />

1 the number of auxiliary bus<strong>in</strong>ess names<br />

2 age of the firm<br />

3 growth of the branch of <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

4 success class<br />

5 growth class<br />

6 log-transformed public R&D fund<strong>in</strong>g received.<br />

We logarithmically transformed public R&D fund<strong>in</strong>g values to reduce the wide ranges of<br />

this variable. The location of the firm did not appear to be a statistically significant factor<br />

for differentiat<strong>in</strong>g between these branches of <strong>in</strong>dustry. In other words, this model seems<br />

to fit firms <strong>in</strong> both a rural area (Eastern F<strong>in</strong>land) and an urban area (the capital area of<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!