dissertation in pdf-format - Aalto-yliopisto

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research, The Qualitative Report, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 597-607. Greiner, L. (1972, 1998). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 50, No. 4, p.37–46, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp.13–30, Reprinted in May–June 1998, including a commentary, ‘Revolution is still inevitable’, pp.55–67. Gudmundson, D., Tower, C.B. and Hartman, E.A. (2003). Innovation in small businesses: Culture and ownership structure do matter, Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 1-17. Gundry, L. K. and Welsch, H. P. (2001). The ambitious entrepreneur: high growth strategies of women owned enterprises, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 16, Issue 6, pp. 453- 470. Handelberg, J. (2012). Aspetcs of Top Management Team and Firm Growth, Ph.D. dissertation, Aalto University, School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland. Heene, A., and Sanchez, R. (1997). Competence-based strategic management. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Heimonen, T. (2012). What are the factors that affect innovation in growing SMEs? European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 15, Issue 1, pp. 122-144. Heimonen, T. and Virtanen, M. (2012). Characteristics of successful gazelles – problems in approaches and methods of analysing the data. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 12-41. Henrekson, M. and Johansson, D. (2008). Gazelles as job creators: A survey and interpretation of the evidence, Small Business Economics, Vol. 35, pp. 227-244. Heydebreck, P., Klofsten, M. and Maier, J. (2000). Innovation support for new technology-based firms: the Swedish Teknopol approach, R&D Management Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 1-12. Hoogstra, G. J. and Van Dijk, J. (2004). Explaining firm employment growth: Does location matter?, Small Business Economics Vol. 22, pp. 179-192. Huergo, E., and Jaumandreu, J. (2004). How does probability of innovation change with firm age? Small Business Economics, Vol. 22, pp. 193-207. Hölzl, W. (2009). Is the R&D behaviour of fast-growing SMEs different? Evidence from CIS data for 16 countries, Small Business Economics, Vol. 33, pp. 59-75. 66
67 References Höyssä, M, Bruun, H. and Hukkinen, J. (2004). The co-evolution of social and physical infrastructure for biotechnology innovation in Turku, Finland, Research Policy, Vol. 33, No. 5, pp.769–785. Janssen, F. (2009). The conceptualisation of growth: Are employment and turnover interchangeable criteria?, The Journal of Entrepreneurship, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 21-45. Jarillo, C., J. (1989). Entrepreneurship and growth: The strategic use of external resources, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 4, pp. 133-147. Johnson, R. B., and Onwuegbuzie, A., J. (2004). Mixed method research: a research paradigm whose time has come, Educational Researcher, Vol. 33, No. 7, pp. 14-26. Julien, P-A. (2001). Gazelles, the jazz band metaphor and further: A case study’, La revue internationale PME, Vol. 14, Nos. 3-4, pp. 1-15. Kanter, R. (1985). Supporting innovation and venture development in established companies, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 1, pp. 47- 60. Kaufmann, A. and Tödtling, F. (2002). SMEs in regional innovation systems and the role of innovation support: The case of Upper Austria, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 27, No. 1. Keeble, D. (1997). Small Firms, Innovation and Regional Development in Britain in the 1990s, Regional Studies, Vol. 31, No.3, pp. 281-293. Kirby, J. (2005). Toward a theory of high performance, Harward Business Review, Vol. 83, No. 7, pp. 30-39. Kiviluoto, N., Brännback, M., and Carsrud, A. (2011). Are firm growth and performance the same or different concepts in empirical entrepreneurship studies? An analysis of the dependent and independent variables, In Raposo, M.,Smallbone, D., Balaton, K., and Hortaványi, L. (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, Growth and Economic Development: Frontiers in European Entrepreneurship Research, pp. 11-29. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA. Klofsten, M. and Jones-Evans, D. (1996). Stimulation of technology-based small firms: A case study of University-Industry co-operation, Technovation, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 187-193. Koellinger, P. (2008). The relationship between technology, innovation, and firm performance-Empirical evidence from e-business in Europe, Research Policy, Vol. 37, pp. 1317-1328. Kohn, M., and Scott, J. T. (1982). Scale economics in research and development: The Schumpeterian hypothesis, Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 30, pp. 239-249. Kuratko, D.F. and Hodgetts, R. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship: A contemporary approach, Harcourt, New York, NY.
Page 3 and 4:
Aalto University publication series
Page 5:
Author Tomi Heimonen Name of the do
Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgements This dissertation
Page 11 and 12:
CONTENTS PART 1: Overview of the di
Page 13:
List of Articles This thesis is bas
Page 16 and 17:
1 Introduction Some scholars claim
Page 18 and 19:
1 Introduction In addition, the dur
Page 20 and 21:
1 Introduction Figure 1: Framework
Page 22 and 23:
1 Introduction factors that affect
Page 24 and 25:
1 Introduction 1.4 Key concepts and
Page 26 and 27: 2 Literature review and conceptual
Page 46 and 47: 3 Research methodology Constructivi
Page 48 and 49: 3 Research methodology and the meth
Page 50 and 51: 3 Research methodology The data use
Page 52 and 53: 3 Research methodology 3.4 Models a
Page 54 and 55: 3 Research methodology reliable. Se
Page 56 and 57: 3 Research methodology concluded th
Page 58 and 59: 4 Results, evaluation of the studie
Page 70 and 71: References Abetti, P. A. (2001). Ac
Page 72 and 73: References Bhide, A. (2000). The or
Page 74 and 75: References Creswell, J. W. (2003).
Page 78 and 79: References Leitch, C., Hill, F., an
Page 80 and 81: References Pellikka, J. and Laurone
Page 82 and 83: References Storper, M. (1992). The
Page 84 and 85: Appendixes Overview: Appendix 1: Ke
Page 86 and 87: Appendixes High growth When examini
Page 88 and 89: Appendixes profitability, liquidity
Page 90 and 91: Appendixes Appendix 1 Continued (Ke
Page 92 and 93: Appendixes Appendix 2 Construction
Page 94 and 95: Appendixes Appendix 2 Continued (Co
Page 96 and 97: not increased compared to Eastern F
Page 98 and 99: ___________________________________
Page 100 and 101: propensity for risk taking (Covin a
Page 102 and 103: 2. Former studies and derivation of
Page 104 and 105: firm’s annual sales growth (Arund
Page 106 and 107: H4. Firm success has an impact on t
Page 108 and 109: other branches in which employment
Page 110 and 111: and Rao, 2008). Because of the unev
Page 112 and 113: Table 1. Characteristics of the dat
Page 114 and 115: firms from other firms. The data in
Page 116 and 117: Table 2. Logistic Regression analys
Page 118 and 119: Public R&D funding was shown to inc
Page 120 and 121: References Achtenhagen, L., Naldi,
Page 122 and 123: Kanter, R. (1985), “Supporting in
Page 124 and 125: Appendix 1. Corporate population ch
Page 126 and 127:
Appendix 3. Distribution of personn
Page 128 and 129:
12 Int. J. Business and Globalisati
Page 130 and 131:
14 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen we u
Page 132 and 133:
16 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen suff
Page 134 and 135:
18 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen Glan
Page 136 and 137:
20 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen 3.2.
Page 138 and 139:
22 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen diff
Page 140 and 141:
24 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen sepa
Page 142 and 143:
26 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen Tabl
Page 144 and 145:
28 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen All
Page 146 and 147:
30 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen 5.2
Page 148 and 149:
32 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen Tabl
Page 150 and 151:
34 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen The
Page 152 and 153:
36 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen Davi
Page 154 and 155:
38 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen Appe
Page 156 and 157:
40 T. Heimonen and M. Virtanen 100
Page 158 and 159:
___________________________________
Page 160 and 161:
412 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen “
Page 162 and 163:
414 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen gro
Page 164 and 165:
416 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen 6 f
Page 166 and 167:
418 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen Fig
Page 168 and 169:
420 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen The
Page 170 and 171:
422 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen the
Page 172 and 173:
424 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen 4.6
Page 174 and 175:
426 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen exc
Page 176 and 177:
428 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen Dav
Page 178 and 179:
430 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen The
Page 180 and 181:
432 M. Virtanen and T. Heimonen Cha
Page 182 and 183:
392 Int. J. Entrepreneurial Venturi
Page 184 and 185:
394 J. Siikonen et al. firms’ gro
Page 186 and 187:
396 J. Siikonen et al. generally re
Page 188 and 189:
398 J. Siikonen et al. determinants
Page 190 and 191:
400 J. Siikonen et al. 3.1 National
Page 192 and 193:
402 J. Siikonen et al. 2 the firm
Page 194 and 195:
404 J. Siikonen et al. 4 Results 4.
Page 196 and 197:
406 J. Siikonen et al. innovation a
Page 198 and 199:
408 J. Siikonen et al. the responde
Page 200 and 201:
410 J. Siikonen et al. activities i
Page 202 and 203:
412 J. Siikonen et al. Eastern Finl
Page 204 and 205:
414 J. Siikonen et al. Delmar, F.,
Page 206 and 207:
416 J. Siikonen et al. Oerlemans, L
Page 208 and 209:
418 J. Siikonen et al. Appendix 1 V
Page 211:
9HSTFMG*afacab+
show all

dissertation in pdf-format - Aalto-yliopisto

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?