20.08.2013 Views

PhD thesis - University of Hertfordshire Research Archive

PhD thesis - University of Hertfordshire Research Archive

PhD thesis - University of Hertfordshire Research Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2. History.<br />

In contrast to other common gastrointestinal pathogens, the history <strong>of</strong><br />

campylobacters is comparatively short (detail provided in Appendix 1). This<br />

relates largely to their exacting growth requirements (optimally 5-7% O2 and<br />

10% CO2 at 42-43°C) rather than a lack <strong>of</strong> interest in them or their recent<br />

emergence. Indeed, campylobacters were probably first described in 1886<br />

by Theodore Escherich, who noted spiral bacteria in the intestinal mucus <strong>of</strong><br />

infants who had died <strong>of</strong> „cholera infantum‟ (Kist, 1985). However, he was<br />

unable to grow the organisms and considered their role to be prognostic<br />

rather than causative. These findings, along with similar observations made<br />

by other German bacteriologists between 1887 and 1894, passed under the<br />

medical radar at the time as they were published in German, and interest<br />

waned due to a lack <strong>of</strong> culturability.<br />

<strong>Research</strong> into the veterinary aspects <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter infection continued,<br />

however, perhaps due to the economic impact <strong>of</strong> the microorganism in this<br />

setting. Commissioned by the British Government to investigate epizootic<br />

abortion in cattle and sheep which was not infrequent at the time,<br />

McFadyean and Stockman were probably the first, in 1906, to isolate<br />

campylobacters from the uterine mucus <strong>of</strong> a pregnant sheep from a flock <strong>of</strong><br />

ewes which was experiencing an abortion rate <strong>of</strong> 33% (Skirrow, 2006).<br />

Theodore Smith and colleagues were the first to describe vibrionic abortion in<br />

cattle in detail, to investigate their pathogenicity and to demonstrate their<br />

antigenic similarity (Smith, 1918; Smith & Taylor, 1919b; Smith, 1919; Smith,<br />

Little, & Taylor, 1920; Smith, 1923). They noted that the foetus suffered<br />

secondarily as a result <strong>of</strong> increasing interference <strong>of</strong> the placental circulation<br />

by the microorganism, which they named Vibrio fetus.<br />

Attention then turned to the role <strong>of</strong> vibrios in diarrhoeal disease in animals.<br />

Through repeated washing, grinding, suspension and culture <strong>of</strong> intestinal<br />

mucosa, Jones, Orcutt and Little isolated, in 1931, tiny motile vibrios from<br />

cows and calves suffering from „epidemic winter scours‟ (Jones & Little,<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!