Blanco, A. C., Esquivel, S., Gianelli, R., Milko, A., Aruj, A., & Moreno, R. P. 2007, "Sepsis por Campylobacter coli en un huésped inmunocompetente", Arch.Argent.Pediatr, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 247-250. Blaser, M. J. 2000, "Campylobacter jejuni and Related Species," in Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice <strong>of</strong> Infectious Diseases, G. L. Mandell, J. P. Bennett, & R. Dolin, eds., Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, pp. 2276-2285. Blaser, M. J. & Reller, L. B. 1981, "Campylobacter enteritis", N.Engl.J.Med, vol. 305, no. 24, pp. 1444-1452. Blaser, M. J., Taylor, D. N., & Feldman, R. A. 1983, "Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter jejuni infections", Epidemiol.Rev., vol. 5, pp. 157-176. Bolton, F. J., Wareing, D. R. A., Skirrow, M. B., & Hutchinson, D. N. 1992, "Identification and biotyping <strong>of</strong> campylobacters", Identification Methods in Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 29, pp. 151-161. Bowler, I. & Day, D. 1992, "Emerging quinolone resistance in campylobacters", Lancet, vol. 340, no. 8813, p. 245. Bruce D., Zochowski, W., & Ferguson, I. R. 1977, "Campylobacter enteritis", Br.Med.J., vol. 6093, p. 1219. Butzler, J. P. 2004, "Campylobacter, from obscurity to celebrity", Clin. Micro.Inf., vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 868-876. Butzler, J. P., Dekeyser, P., Detrain, M., & Dehaen, F. 1973, "Related vibrio in stools", J.Pediatr., vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 493-495. 65
Cameron, S., Ried, K., Worsley, A., & Topping, D. 2004, "Consumption <strong>of</strong> foods by young children with diagnosed Campylobacter infection - a pilot case-control study", Public Health Nutr., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 85-89. Campylobacter Sentinel Surveillance Scheme Collaborators 2002, "Cipr<strong>of</strong>loxacin resistance in Campylobacter jejuni: case-case analysis as a tool for elucidating risks at home and abroad", J Antimicrob.Chemother., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 561-568. Campylobacter Sentinel Surveillance Scheme Collaborators 2003a, "Ethnicity and Campylobacter infection: a population-based questionnaire survey", J Infect, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 210-216. Campylobacter Sentinel Surveillance Scheme Collaborators 2003b, "Foreign and domestic travel and the risk <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter infection: results from a population-based sentinel surveillance scheme", J Travel Med., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 136-138. Carrique-Mas, J., Andersson, Y., Hjertqvist, M., Svensson, A., Torner, A., & Giesecke, J. 2005, "Risk factors for domestic sporadic campylobacteriosis among young children in Sweden", Scand.J.Infect.Dis., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 101-110. Chan, K., Miller, W. G., Mandrell, R. E., & Kathariou, S. 2007, "The absence <strong>of</strong> intervening sequences in 23S rRNA genes <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter coli isolates from Turkeys is a unique attribute <strong>of</strong> a cluster <strong>of</strong> related strains which also lack resistance to erythromycin", Appl.Environ.Microbiol., vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 1208-1214. 66
- Page 1 and 2:
Population-Based Sentinel Surveilla
- Page 3 and 4:
The research carried out by the can
- Page 5 and 6:
Dedication. This thesis is dedicate
- Page 7 and 8:
7. Results (the published work). ..
- Page 9 and 10:
Statement identifying the degree fo
- Page 11 and 12:
Paper Reference Page 6 Gillespie IA
- Page 13 and 14:
Statement of the candidate’s cont
- Page 15 and 16: Declaration form. I, Iain Andrew Gi
- Page 17 and 18: 2. History. In contrast to other co
- Page 19 and 20: The application of veterinary techn
- Page 21 and 22: The incidence of laboratory-confirm
- Page 23 and 24: were elderly or had a pre-existing
- Page 25 and 26: they would for other bacterial gast
- Page 27 and 28: papers (Pearson et al., 1977; Bruce
- Page 29 and 30: Studies were most frequently conduc
- Page 31 and 32: The content of peer-reviewed public
- Page 33 and 34: infection. An approximation of the
- Page 35 and 36: hypotheses a „blank canvas‟ app
- Page 37 and 38: 6. Materials and methods. Regional
- Page 39 and 40: presentation and severity, foreign
- Page 41 and 42: together, etc). The results of the
- Page 43 and 44: and improve response during the stu
- Page 45 and 46: The published work. 7.1 Epidemiolog
- Page 47 and 48: community illness was more common a
- Page 49 and 50: north west England and in Yorkshire
- Page 51 and 52: community was no different from oth
- Page 53 and 54: provide useful insights into the ep
- Page 55 and 56: Cases in case-control studies of la
- Page 57 and 58: 8. Discussion. The research carried
- Page 59 and 60: The sentinel health authorities wer
- Page 61 and 62: fundamentally flawed. Since the app
- Page 63 and 64: control studies. The potential role
- Page 65: Campylobacter spp. from cattle farm
- Page 69 and 70: Doyle, L. P. 1948, "The etiology of
- Page 71 and 72: other industrialised countries," in
- Page 73 and 74: Hanel, C. M. & Atanassova, V. 2007,
- Page 75 and 76: Hudson, S. J., Lightfoot, N. F., Co
- Page 77 and 78: Kessel, A. S., Gillespie, I., O'Bri
- Page 79 and 80: costs-of-illness, Rijksinstituut vo
- Page 81 and 82: Department of Health and Human Serv
- Page 83 and 84: Potter, R. C., Kaneene, J. B., & Ha
- Page 85 and 86: Siemer, B. L., Harrington, C. S., N
- Page 87 and 88: Sopwith, W., Birtles, A., Matthews,
- Page 89 and 90: Campylobacter infection: a general
- Page 91: The published work 90
- Page 102 and 103: 101
- Page 104 and 105: 103
- Page 106 and 107: 105
- Page 108 and 109: 107
- Page 110 and 111: 109
- Page 112 and 113: 111
- Page 114 and 115: 113
- Page 116 and 117:
115
- Page 118 and 119:
117
- Page 120 and 121:
119
- Page 122 and 123:
121
- Page 124 and 125:
123
- Page 126 and 127:
125
- Page 128 and 129:
127
- Page 130 and 131:
129
- Page 132 and 133:
131
- Page 134 and 135:
133
- Page 136 and 137:
135
- Page 138 and 139:
137
- Page 140 and 141:
139
- Page 142 and 143:
141
- Page 144 and 145:
Table A1.1: Notable events in the h
- Page 146 and 147:
Year Human medicine Veterinary medi
- Page 148 and 149:
Levy, A. J. 1928, "A gastro-enterit
- Page 150 and 151:
Appendix 2. An assessment of the ro
- Page 152 and 153:
compare the period after 2000 with
- Page 154 and 155:
condition was significantly associa
- Page 156 and 157:
Deaths/100,000 cases 600 500 400 30
- Page 158 and 159:
Table A2.1: Factors affecting the u
- Page 160 and 161:
Appendix 3. An analytical review of
- Page 162 and 163:
to indigenously acquired infection
- Page 164 and 165:
susceptibility to Campylobacter inf
- Page 166 and 167:
year demonstrated that only the num
- Page 168 and 169:
Table A3.1 Reported epidemiological
- Page 170 and 171:
Table A3.3 Selected reported risk f
- Page 172 and 173:
Table A3.5. The effect of various r
- Page 174 and 175:
Deming, M. S., Tauxe, R. V., Blake,
- Page 176 and 177:
Harris, N. V., Weiss, N. S., & Nola
- Page 178 and 179:
Kist, M. & Rossner, R. 1985a, in Ca
- Page 180 and 181:
Oosterom, J., den Uyl, C. H., Banff
- Page 182 and 183:
Severin, W. P. J. 1982, "Epidemiolo
- Page 184 and 185:
Appendix 4. The Campylobacter Senti
- Page 186 and 187:
185
- Page 188 and 189:
187