9. References Adak, G. K., Cowden, J. M., Nicholas, S., & Evans, H. S. 1995, "The Public Health Laboratory Service national case-control study <strong>of</strong> primary indigenous sporadic cases <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter infection", Epidemiol.Infect., vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 15-22. Adak, G. K., Meakins, S. M., Yip, H., Lopman, B. A., & O'Brien, S. J. 2005, "Disease risks from foods, England and Wales, 1996-2000", Emerg.Infect.Dis., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 365-372. Altekruse, S. F. & Tollefson, L. K. 2003, "Human campylobacteriosis: a challenge for the veterinary pr<strong>of</strong>ession", J.Am.Vet.Med.Assoc., vol. 223, no. 4, pp. 445-452. Alter, T. & Scherer, K. 2006, "Stress response <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter spp. and its role in food processing", J.Vet.Med. Infect.Dis.Vet.Public Health, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 351-357. Álvarez, F. V., Estrada Lorenzo, J. M., & Pérez, C. 2007, Occupational Health: concepts and techniques for preventing occupational risks, Revista Española de Salud Pública, SciELO Brasil. Anon. MeasuringWorth.com. Purchasing Power <strong>of</strong> British Pounds from 1264 to 2006. http://www.measuringworth.com/ppoweruk/# . Accessed 30/11/2007. Bae, W., Kaya, K. N., Hancock, D. D., Call, D. R., Park, Y. H., & Besser, T. E. 2005, "Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance <strong>of</strong> thermophilic 63
Campylobacter spp. from cattle farms in Washington State", Appl.Environ.Microbiol., vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 169-174. Baker, M., Wilson, N., McIntyre, M., & McLean, M. 2005, "Findings and methodological lessons from a small case-control study into campylobacteriosis in Wellington", N.Z.Med.J., vol. 118, no. 1220, p. U1622. Best, E. L., Fox, A. J., Frost, J. A., & Bolton, F. J. 2004, "Identification <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter jejuni multilocus sequence type ST-21 clonal complex by single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis", J.Clin.Microbiol., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 2836-2839. Best, E. L., Fox, A. J., Owen, R. J., Cheesbrough, J., & Bolton, F. J. 2007, "Specific detection <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter jejuni from faeces using single nucleotide polymorphisms", Epidemiol.Infect., vol. 135, no. 5, pp. 839-846. Best, E. L., Powell, E. J., Swift, C., Grant, K. A., & Frost, J. A. 2003, "Applicability <strong>of</strong> a rapid duplex real-time PCR assay for speciation <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli directly from culture plates", FEMS Microbiol.Lett., vol. 229, no. 2, pp. 237-241. Black, A. P., Kirk, M. D., & Millard, G. 2006, "Campylobacter outbreak due to chicken consumption at an Australian Capital Territory restaurant", Commun.Dis.Intell., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 373-377. Black, R. E., Levine, M. M., Clements, M. L., Hughes, T. P., & Blaser, M. J. 1988, "Experimental Campylobacter jejuni infection in humans", J.Infect.Dis., vol. 157, no. 3, pp. 472-479. 64
- Page 1 and 2:
Population-Based Sentinel Surveilla
- Page 3 and 4:
The research carried out by the can
- Page 5 and 6:
Dedication. This thesis is dedicate
- Page 7 and 8:
7. Results (the published work). ..
- Page 9 and 10:
Statement identifying the degree fo
- Page 11 and 12:
Paper Reference Page 6 Gillespie IA
- Page 13 and 14: Statement of the candidate’s cont
- Page 15 and 16: Declaration form. I, Iain Andrew Gi
- Page 17 and 18: 2. History. In contrast to other co
- Page 19 and 20: The application of veterinary techn
- Page 21 and 22: The incidence of laboratory-confirm
- Page 23 and 24: were elderly or had a pre-existing
- Page 25 and 26: they would for other bacterial gast
- Page 27 and 28: papers (Pearson et al., 1977; Bruce
- Page 29 and 30: Studies were most frequently conduc
- Page 31 and 32: The content of peer-reviewed public
- Page 33 and 34: infection. An approximation of the
- Page 35 and 36: hypotheses a „blank canvas‟ app
- Page 37 and 38: 6. Materials and methods. Regional
- Page 39 and 40: presentation and severity, foreign
- Page 41 and 42: together, etc). The results of the
- Page 43 and 44: and improve response during the stu
- Page 45 and 46: The published work. 7.1 Epidemiolog
- Page 47 and 48: community illness was more common a
- Page 49 and 50: north west England and in Yorkshire
- Page 51 and 52: community was no different from oth
- Page 53 and 54: provide useful insights into the ep
- Page 55 and 56: Cases in case-control studies of la
- Page 57 and 58: 8. Discussion. The research carried
- Page 59 and 60: The sentinel health authorities wer
- Page 61 and 62: fundamentally flawed. Since the app
- Page 63: control studies. The potential role
- Page 67 and 68: Cameron, S., Ried, K., Worsley, A.,
- Page 69 and 70: Doyle, L. P. 1948, "The etiology of
- Page 71 and 72: other industrialised countries," in
- Page 73 and 74: Hanel, C. M. & Atanassova, V. 2007,
- Page 75 and 76: Hudson, S. J., Lightfoot, N. F., Co
- Page 77 and 78: Kessel, A. S., Gillespie, I., O'Bri
- Page 79 and 80: costs-of-illness, Rijksinstituut vo
- Page 81 and 82: Department of Health and Human Serv
- Page 83 and 84: Potter, R. C., Kaneene, J. B., & Ha
- Page 85 and 86: Siemer, B. L., Harrington, C. S., N
- Page 87 and 88: Sopwith, W., Birtles, A., Matthews,
- Page 89 and 90: Campylobacter infection: a general
- Page 91: The published work 90
- Page 102 and 103: 101
- Page 104 and 105: 103
- Page 106 and 107: 105
- Page 108 and 109: 107
- Page 110 and 111: 109
- Page 112 and 113: 111
- Page 114 and 115:
113
- Page 116 and 117:
115
- Page 118 and 119:
117
- Page 120 and 121:
119
- Page 122 and 123:
121
- Page 124 and 125:
123
- Page 126 and 127:
125
- Page 128 and 129:
127
- Page 130 and 131:
129
- Page 132 and 133:
131
- Page 134 and 135:
133
- Page 136 and 137:
135
- Page 138 and 139:
137
- Page 140 and 141:
139
- Page 142 and 143:
141
- Page 144 and 145:
Table A1.1: Notable events in the h
- Page 146 and 147:
Year Human medicine Veterinary medi
- Page 148 and 149:
Levy, A. J. 1928, "A gastro-enterit
- Page 150 and 151:
Appendix 2. An assessment of the ro
- Page 152 and 153:
compare the period after 2000 with
- Page 154 and 155:
condition was significantly associa
- Page 156 and 157:
Deaths/100,000 cases 600 500 400 30
- Page 158 and 159:
Table A2.1: Factors affecting the u
- Page 160 and 161:
Appendix 3. An analytical review of
- Page 162 and 163:
to indigenously acquired infection
- Page 164 and 165:
susceptibility to Campylobacter inf
- Page 166 and 167:
year demonstrated that only the num
- Page 168 and 169:
Table A3.1 Reported epidemiological
- Page 170 and 171:
Table A3.3 Selected reported risk f
- Page 172 and 173:
Table A3.5. The effect of various r
- Page 174 and 175:
Deming, M. S., Tauxe, R. V., Blake,
- Page 176 and 177:
Harris, N. V., Weiss, N. S., & Nola
- Page 178 and 179:
Kist, M. & Rossner, R. 1985a, in Ca
- Page 180 and 181:
Oosterom, J., den Uyl, C. H., Banff
- Page 182 and 183:
Severin, W. P. J. 1982, "Epidemiolo
- Page 184 and 185:
Appendix 4. The Campylobacter Senti
- Page 186 and 187:
185
- Page 188 and 189:
187