Studahl, A. & Andersson, Y. 2000, "Risk factors for indigenous Campylobacter infection: a Swedish case-control study", Epidemiol.Infect., vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 269-275. Svenungsson, B., Lagergren, A., Ekwall, E., Evengard, B., Hedlund, K. O., Karnell, A., L<strong>of</strong>dahl, S., Svensson, L., & Weintraub, A. 2000, "Enteropathogens in adult patients with diarrhea and healthy control subjects: a 1-year prospective study in a Swedish clinic for infectious diseases", Clin.Infect.Dis., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 770-778. Tam, C. C. 2001, "Campylobacter reporting at its peak year <strong>of</strong> 1998: don't count your chickens yet", Commun.Dis.Public.Health, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 194- 199. Tam, C. C., O'Brien, S. J., Adak, G. K., Meakins, S. M., & Frost, J. A. 2003, "Campylobacter coli - an important foodborne pathogen", J.Infect., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 28-32. Tam, C. C., O'Brien, S. J., & Rodrigues, L. C. 2006, "Influenza, Campylobacter and Mycoplasma infections, and hospital admissions for Guillain-Barre Syndrome, England", Emerg.Infect.Dis., vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1880-1887. Tam, C. C., Rodrigues, L. C., O'Brien, S. J., & Hajat, S. 2006a, "Temperature dependence <strong>of</strong> reported Campylobacter infection in England, 1989-1999", Epidemiol.Infect., vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 119-125. Tam, C. C., Rodrigues, L. C., Petersen, I., Islam, A., Hayward, A., & O'Brien, S. J. 2006b, "Incidence <strong>of</strong> Guillain-Barre syndrome among patients with 87
Campylobacter infection: a general practice research database study", J Infect.Dis., vol. 194, no. 1, pp. 95-97. Taylor, D. N., McDermott, K. T., Little, J. R., Wells, J. G., & Blaser, M. J. 1983, "Campylobacter enteritis from untreated water in the Rocky Mountains", Ann.Intern.Med., vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 38-40. Tenkate, T. D. & Stafford, R. J. 2001, "Risk factors for Campylobacter infection in infants and young children: a matched case-control study", Epidemiol.Infect., vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 399-404. Ternhag, A., Torner, A., Svensson, A., Giesecke, J., & Ekdahl, K. 2005, "Mortality following Campylobacter infection: a registry-based linkage study", BMC.Infect.Dis., vol. 5, p. 70. Teunis, P., Van Den Brandh<strong>of</strong>, W., Nauta, M., Wagenaar, J., Van Den Kerkh<strong>of</strong>, H., & Van Pelt, W. 2005, "A reconsideration <strong>of</strong> the Campylobacter dose response relation", Epidemiol.Infect., vol. 133, no. 04, pp. 583-592. Thwaites, R. T. & Frost, J. A. 1999, "Drug resistance in Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli, and C. lari isolated from humans in north west England and Wales, 1997", J Clin.Pathol., vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 812-814. Uzoigwe, C. 2005, "Campylobacter infections <strong>of</strong> the pericardium and myocardium", Clin.Microbiol.Infect., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 253-255. Vicente, A., Barros, R., Florinda, A., Silva, A., & Hanscheid, T. 2008, "High rates <strong>of</strong> fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter in Portugal-need for surveillance", Eurosurveillance, vol. 13, no. 6. 88
- Page 1 and 2:
Population-Based Sentinel Surveilla
- Page 3 and 4:
The research carried out by the can
- Page 5 and 6:
Dedication. This thesis is dedicate
- Page 7 and 8:
7. Results (the published work). ..
- Page 9 and 10:
Statement identifying the degree fo
- Page 11 and 12:
Paper Reference Page 6 Gillespie IA
- Page 13 and 14:
Statement of the candidate’s cont
- Page 15 and 16:
Declaration form. I, Iain Andrew Gi
- Page 17 and 18:
2. History. In contrast to other co
- Page 19 and 20:
The application of veterinary techn
- Page 21 and 22:
The incidence of laboratory-confirm
- Page 23 and 24:
were elderly or had a pre-existing
- Page 25 and 26:
they would for other bacterial gast
- Page 27 and 28:
papers (Pearson et al., 1977; Bruce
- Page 29 and 30:
Studies were most frequently conduc
- Page 31 and 32:
The content of peer-reviewed public
- Page 33 and 34:
infection. An approximation of the
- Page 35 and 36:
hypotheses a „blank canvas‟ app
- Page 37 and 38: 6. Materials and methods. Regional
- Page 39 and 40: presentation and severity, foreign
- Page 41 and 42: together, etc). The results of the
- Page 43 and 44: and improve response during the stu
- Page 45 and 46: The published work. 7.1 Epidemiolog
- Page 47 and 48: community illness was more common a
- Page 49 and 50: north west England and in Yorkshire
- Page 51 and 52: community was no different from oth
- Page 53 and 54: provide useful insights into the ep
- Page 55 and 56: Cases in case-control studies of la
- Page 57 and 58: 8. Discussion. The research carried
- Page 59 and 60: The sentinel health authorities wer
- Page 61 and 62: fundamentally flawed. Since the app
- Page 63 and 64: control studies. The potential role
- Page 65 and 66: Campylobacter spp. from cattle farm
- Page 67 and 68: Cameron, S., Ried, K., Worsley, A.,
- Page 69 and 70: Doyle, L. P. 1948, "The etiology of
- Page 71 and 72: other industrialised countries," in
- Page 73 and 74: Hanel, C. M. & Atanassova, V. 2007,
- Page 75 and 76: Hudson, S. J., Lightfoot, N. F., Co
- Page 77 and 78: Kessel, A. S., Gillespie, I., O'Bri
- Page 79 and 80: costs-of-illness, Rijksinstituut vo
- Page 81 and 82: Department of Health and Human Serv
- Page 83 and 84: Potter, R. C., Kaneene, J. B., & Ha
- Page 85 and 86: Siemer, B. L., Harrington, C. S., N
- Page 87: Sopwith, W., Birtles, A., Matthews,
- Page 91: The published work 90
- Page 102 and 103: 101
- Page 104 and 105: 103
- Page 106 and 107: 105
- Page 108 and 109: 107
- Page 110 and 111: 109
- Page 112 and 113: 111
- Page 114 and 115: 113
- Page 116 and 117: 115
- Page 118 and 119: 117
- Page 120 and 121: 119
- Page 122 and 123: 121
- Page 124 and 125: 123
- Page 126 and 127: 125
- Page 128 and 129: 127
- Page 130 and 131: 129
- Page 132 and 133: 131
- Page 134 and 135: 133
- Page 136 and 137: 135
- Page 138 and 139:
137
- Page 140 and 141:
139
- Page 142 and 143:
141
- Page 144 and 145:
Table A1.1: Notable events in the h
- Page 146 and 147:
Year Human medicine Veterinary medi
- Page 148 and 149:
Levy, A. J. 1928, "A gastro-enterit
- Page 150 and 151:
Appendix 2. An assessment of the ro
- Page 152 and 153:
compare the period after 2000 with
- Page 154 and 155:
condition was significantly associa
- Page 156 and 157:
Deaths/100,000 cases 600 500 400 30
- Page 158 and 159:
Table A2.1: Factors affecting the u
- Page 160 and 161:
Appendix 3. An analytical review of
- Page 162 and 163:
to indigenously acquired infection
- Page 164 and 165:
susceptibility to Campylobacter inf
- Page 166 and 167:
year demonstrated that only the num
- Page 168 and 169:
Table A3.1 Reported epidemiological
- Page 170 and 171:
Table A3.3 Selected reported risk f
- Page 172 and 173:
Table A3.5. The effect of various r
- Page 174 and 175:
Deming, M. S., Tauxe, R. V., Blake,
- Page 176 and 177:
Harris, N. V., Weiss, N. S., & Nola
- Page 178 and 179:
Kist, M. & Rossner, R. 1985a, in Ca
- Page 180 and 181:
Oosterom, J., den Uyl, C. H., Banff
- Page 182 and 183:
Severin, W. P. J. 1982, "Epidemiolo
- Page 184 and 185:
Appendix 4. The Campylobacter Senti
- Page 186 and 187:
185
- Page 188 and 189:
187