Harris, N. V., Weiss, N. S., & Nolan, C. M. 1986, "The role <strong>of</strong> poultry and meats in the etiology <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter jejuni/coli enteritis", Am.J.Public Health, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 407-411. Hopkins, R. S., Olmsted, R., & Istre, G. R. 1984, "Endemic Campylobacter jejuni infection in Colorado: identified risk factors", Am.J.Public Health, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 249-250. Hopkins, R. S. & Olmsted, R. N. 1985, "Campylobacter jejuni infection in Colorado: unexplained excess <strong>of</strong> cases in males", Public Health Rep., vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 333-336. Hopkins, R. S. & Scott, A. S. 1983, "Handling raw chicken as a source for sporadic Campylobacter jejuni infections", J.Infect.Dis., vol. 148, no. 4, p. 770. Hudson, S. J., Lightfoot, N. F., Coulson, J. C., Russell, K., Sisson, P. R., & Sobo, A. O. 1991, "Jackdaws and magpies as vectors <strong>of</strong> milkborne human Campylobacter infection", Epidemiol.Infect., vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 363-372. Hudson, S. J., Sobo, A. O., Russel, K., & Lightfoot, N. F. 1990, "Jackdaws as potential source <strong>of</strong> milk-borne Campylobacter jejuni infection", Lancet, vol. 335, no. 8698, p. 1160. Ikram, R., Chambers, S., Mitchell, P., Brieseman, M. A., & Ikam, O. H. 1994, "A case control study to determine risk factors for Campylobacter infection in Christchurch in the summer <strong>of</strong> 1992-3", N.Z.Med.J., vol. 107, no. 988, pp. 430-432. 175
Kapperud, G., Espeland, G., Wahl, E., Walde, A., Herikstad, H., Gustavsen, S., Tveit, I., Natas, O., Bevanger, L., & Digranes, A. 2003, "Factors associated with increased and decreased risk <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter infection: a prospective case-control study in Norway", Am.J.Epidemiol., vol. 158, no. 3, pp. 234-242. Kapperud, G., Skjerve, E., Bean, N. H., Ostr<strong>of</strong>f, S. M., & Lassen, J. 1992, "Risk factors for sporadic Campylobacter infections: results <strong>of</strong> a case-control study in southeastern Norway", J.Clin.Microbiol., vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 3117- 3121. Kassenborg, H. D., Smith, K. E., Vugia, D. J., Rabatsky-Ehr, T., Bates, M. R., Carter, M. A., Dumas, N. B., Cassidy, M. P., Marano, N., Tauxe, R. V., & Angulo, F. J. 2004, "Fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter infections: eating poultry outside <strong>of</strong> the home and foreign travel are risk factors", Clin.Infect.Dis., vol. 38 Suppl 3, pp. S279-S284. Kist, M. 1982, "Campylobacter enteritis: epidemiological and clinical data from recent isolations in the region <strong>of</strong> Feiburg, West Germany," in Campylobacter. Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Biochemistry, D. G. Newell, ed., Springer, pp. 138-143. Kist, M. 1983, "Campylobacter enteritis in an industrial country: epidemiological features in urban and rural area," in Campylobacter II: Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the Second International Workshop on Campylobacter, Helicobacter and Related Organisms., A. D. Pearson, ed., Public Health Laboratory Service, London, p. 140. 176
- Page 1 and 2:
Population-Based Sentinel Surveilla
- Page 3 and 4:
The research carried out by the can
- Page 5 and 6:
Dedication. This thesis is dedicate
- Page 7 and 8:
7. Results (the published work). ..
- Page 9 and 10:
Statement identifying the degree fo
- Page 11 and 12:
Paper Reference Page 6 Gillespie IA
- Page 13 and 14:
Statement of the candidate’s cont
- Page 15 and 16:
Declaration form. I, Iain Andrew Gi
- Page 17 and 18:
2. History. In contrast to other co
- Page 19 and 20:
The application of veterinary techn
- Page 21 and 22:
The incidence of laboratory-confirm
- Page 23 and 24:
were elderly or had a pre-existing
- Page 25 and 26:
they would for other bacterial gast
- Page 27 and 28:
papers (Pearson et al., 1977; Bruce
- Page 29 and 30:
Studies were most frequently conduc
- Page 31 and 32:
The content of peer-reviewed public
- Page 33 and 34:
infection. An approximation of the
- Page 35 and 36:
hypotheses a „blank canvas‟ app
- Page 37 and 38:
6. Materials and methods. Regional
- Page 39 and 40:
presentation and severity, foreign
- Page 41 and 42:
together, etc). The results of the
- Page 43 and 44:
and improve response during the stu
- Page 45 and 46:
The published work. 7.1 Epidemiolog
- Page 47 and 48:
community illness was more common a
- Page 49 and 50:
north west England and in Yorkshire
- Page 51 and 52:
community was no different from oth
- Page 53 and 54:
provide useful insights into the ep
- Page 55 and 56:
Cases in case-control studies of la
- Page 57 and 58:
8. Discussion. The research carried
- Page 59 and 60:
The sentinel health authorities wer
- Page 61 and 62:
fundamentally flawed. Since the app
- Page 63 and 64:
control studies. The potential role
- Page 65 and 66:
Campylobacter spp. from cattle farm
- Page 67 and 68:
Cameron, S., Ried, K., Worsley, A.,
- Page 69 and 70:
Doyle, L. P. 1948, "The etiology of
- Page 71 and 72:
other industrialised countries," in
- Page 73 and 74:
Hanel, C. M. & Atanassova, V. 2007,
- Page 75 and 76:
Hudson, S. J., Lightfoot, N. F., Co
- Page 77 and 78:
Kessel, A. S., Gillespie, I., O'Bri
- Page 79 and 80:
costs-of-illness, Rijksinstituut vo
- Page 81 and 82:
Department of Health and Human Serv
- Page 83 and 84:
Potter, R. C., Kaneene, J. B., & Ha
- Page 85 and 86:
Siemer, B. L., Harrington, C. S., N
- Page 87 and 88:
Sopwith, W., Birtles, A., Matthews,
- Page 89 and 90:
Campylobacter infection: a general
- Page 91:
The published work 90
- Page 102 and 103:
101
- Page 104 and 105:
103
- Page 106 and 107:
105
- Page 108 and 109:
107
- Page 110 and 111:
109
- Page 112 and 113:
111
- Page 114 and 115:
113
- Page 116 and 117:
115
- Page 118 and 119:
117
- Page 120 and 121:
119
- Page 122 and 123:
121
- Page 124 and 125:
123
- Page 126 and 127: 125
- Page 128 and 129: 127
- Page 130 and 131: 129
- Page 132 and 133: 131
- Page 134 and 135: 133
- Page 136 and 137: 135
- Page 138 and 139: 137
- Page 140 and 141: 139
- Page 142 and 143: 141
- Page 144 and 145: Table A1.1: Notable events in the h
- Page 146 and 147: Year Human medicine Veterinary medi
- Page 148 and 149: Levy, A. J. 1928, "A gastro-enterit
- Page 150 and 151: Appendix 2. An assessment of the ro
- Page 152 and 153: compare the period after 2000 with
- Page 154 and 155: condition was significantly associa
- Page 156 and 157: Deaths/100,000 cases 600 500 400 30
- Page 158 and 159: Table A2.1: Factors affecting the u
- Page 160 and 161: Appendix 3. An analytical review of
- Page 162 and 163: to indigenously acquired infection
- Page 164 and 165: susceptibility to Campylobacter inf
- Page 166 and 167: year demonstrated that only the num
- Page 168 and 169: Table A3.1 Reported epidemiological
- Page 170 and 171: Table A3.3 Selected reported risk f
- Page 172 and 173: Table A3.5. The effect of various r
- Page 174 and 175: Deming, M. S., Tauxe, R. V., Blake,
- Page 178 and 179: Kist, M. & Rossner, R. 1985a, in Ca
- Page 180 and 181: Oosterom, J., den Uyl, C. H., Banff
- Page 182 and 183: Severin, W. P. J. 1982, "Epidemiolo
- Page 184 and 185: Appendix 4. The Campylobacter Senti
- Page 186 and 187: 185
- Page 188 and 189: 187