Cheng, A. C., McDonald, J. R., & Thielman, N. M. 2005, "Infectious diarrhea in developed and developing countries", J.Clin.Gastroenterol., vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 757-773. Coker, A. O., Isokpehi, R. D., Thomas, B. N., Amisu, K. O., & Obi, C. L. 2002, "Human campylobacteriosis in developing countries", Emerg.Infect.Dis., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 237-244. D'lima, C. B., Miller, W. G., Mandrell, R. E., Wright, S. L., Siletzky, R. M., Carver, D. K., & Kathariou, S. 2007, "Clonal population structure and specific genotypes <strong>of</strong> multidrug-resistant Campylobacter coli from Turkeys", Appl.Environ.Microbiol., vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 2156-2164. Dean, A. G., Dean, J. A., Burton, A. H., & Discker, R. C. 1996, Epi Info: a word processing, database, and statistics programme for epidemiology on microcomputers, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. Dekeyser, P., Gossuin-Detrain, M., Butzler, J. P., & Sternon, J. 1972, "Acute enteritis due to related vibrio: first positive stool cultures", J Infect.Dis., vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 390-392. Deming, M. S., Tauxe, R. V., Blake, P. A., Dixon, S. E., Fowler, B. S., Jones, T. S., Lockamy, E. A., Patton, C. M., & Sikes, R. O. 1987, "Campylobacter enteritis at a university: transmission from eating chicken and from cats", Am.J.Epidemiol., vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 526-534. Doyle, L. P. 1944, "A vibrio associated with swine dysentery", Am.J.Vet.Res., vol. 5, pp. 3-5. 67
Doyle, L. P. 1948, "The etiology <strong>of</strong> swine dysentery", Am.J.Vet.Res., vol. 9, pp. 50-51. Eberhart-Phillips, J., Walker, N., Garrett, N., Bell, D., Sinclair, D., Rainger, W., & Bates, M. 1997, "Campylobacteriosis in New Zealand: results <strong>of</strong> a case-control study", J.Epidemiol.Community Health, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 686- 691. Effler, P., Leong, M. C., Kimura, A., Nakata, M., Burr, R., Cremer, E., & Slutsker, L. 2001, "Sporadic Campylobacter jejuni infections in Hawaii: associations with prior antibiotic use and commercially prepared chicken", J.Infect.Dis., vol. 183, no. 7, pp. 1152-1155. Endtz, H. P., Ruijs, G. J., van Klingeren, B., Jansen, W. H., van der Reyden, R. T., & Mouton, R. P. 1991, "Quinolone resistance in campylobacter isolated from man and poultry following the introduction <strong>of</strong> fluoroquinolones in veterinary medicine", J Antimicrob.Chemother., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 199-208. Engberg, J., Neimann, J., Nielsen, E. M., Aerestrup, F. M., & Fussing, V. 2004, "Quinolone-resistant Campylobacter infections: risk factors and clinical consequences", Emerg.Infect.Dis., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1056-1063. Engleberg, N. C., Correa-Villasenor, A., North, C. Q., Crow, T., Wells, J. G., & Blake, P. A. 1984, "Campylobacter enteritis on Hopi and Navajo Indian reservations. Clinical and epidemiologic features", West J.Med, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 53-56. Ethelberg, S., Simonsen, J., Gerner-Smidt, P., Olsen, K. E., & Molbak, K. 2005, "Spatial distribution and registry-based case-control analysis <strong>of</strong> 68
- Page 1 and 2:
Population-Based Sentinel Surveilla
- Page 3 and 4:
The research carried out by the can
- Page 5 and 6:
Dedication. This thesis is dedicate
- Page 7 and 8:
7. Results (the published work). ..
- Page 9 and 10:
Statement identifying the degree fo
- Page 11 and 12:
Paper Reference Page 6 Gillespie IA
- Page 13 and 14:
Statement of the candidate’s cont
- Page 15 and 16:
Declaration form. I, Iain Andrew Gi
- Page 17 and 18: 2. History. In contrast to other co
- Page 19 and 20: The application of veterinary techn
- Page 21 and 22: The incidence of laboratory-confirm
- Page 23 and 24: were elderly or had a pre-existing
- Page 25 and 26: they would for other bacterial gast
- Page 27 and 28: papers (Pearson et al., 1977; Bruce
- Page 29 and 30: Studies were most frequently conduc
- Page 31 and 32: The content of peer-reviewed public
- Page 33 and 34: infection. An approximation of the
- Page 35 and 36: hypotheses a „blank canvas‟ app
- Page 37 and 38: 6. Materials and methods. Regional
- Page 39 and 40: presentation and severity, foreign
- Page 41 and 42: together, etc). The results of the
- Page 43 and 44: and improve response during the stu
- Page 45 and 46: The published work. 7.1 Epidemiolog
- Page 47 and 48: community illness was more common a
- Page 49 and 50: north west England and in Yorkshire
- Page 51 and 52: community was no different from oth
- Page 53 and 54: provide useful insights into the ep
- Page 55 and 56: Cases in case-control studies of la
- Page 57 and 58: 8. Discussion. The research carried
- Page 59 and 60: The sentinel health authorities wer
- Page 61 and 62: fundamentally flawed. Since the app
- Page 63 and 64: control studies. The potential role
- Page 65 and 66: Campylobacter spp. from cattle farm
- Page 67: Cameron, S., Ried, K., Worsley, A.,
- Page 71 and 72: other industrialised countries," in
- Page 73 and 74: Hanel, C. M. & Atanassova, V. 2007,
- Page 75 and 76: Hudson, S. J., Lightfoot, N. F., Co
- Page 77 and 78: Kessel, A. S., Gillespie, I., O'Bri
- Page 79 and 80: costs-of-illness, Rijksinstituut vo
- Page 81 and 82: Department of Health and Human Serv
- Page 83 and 84: Potter, R. C., Kaneene, J. B., & Ha
- Page 85 and 86: Siemer, B. L., Harrington, C. S., N
- Page 87 and 88: Sopwith, W., Birtles, A., Matthews,
- Page 89 and 90: Campylobacter infection: a general
- Page 91: The published work 90
- Page 102 and 103: 101
- Page 104 and 105: 103
- Page 106 and 107: 105
- Page 108 and 109: 107
- Page 110 and 111: 109
- Page 112 and 113: 111
- Page 114 and 115: 113
- Page 116 and 117: 115
- Page 118 and 119:
117
- Page 120 and 121:
119
- Page 122 and 123:
121
- Page 124 and 125:
123
- Page 126 and 127:
125
- Page 128 and 129:
127
- Page 130 and 131:
129
- Page 132 and 133:
131
- Page 134 and 135:
133
- Page 136 and 137:
135
- Page 138 and 139:
137
- Page 140 and 141:
139
- Page 142 and 143:
141
- Page 144 and 145:
Table A1.1: Notable events in the h
- Page 146 and 147:
Year Human medicine Veterinary medi
- Page 148 and 149:
Levy, A. J. 1928, "A gastro-enterit
- Page 150 and 151:
Appendix 2. An assessment of the ro
- Page 152 and 153:
compare the period after 2000 with
- Page 154 and 155:
condition was significantly associa
- Page 156 and 157:
Deaths/100,000 cases 600 500 400 30
- Page 158 and 159:
Table A2.1: Factors affecting the u
- Page 160 and 161:
Appendix 3. An analytical review of
- Page 162 and 163:
to indigenously acquired infection
- Page 164 and 165:
susceptibility to Campylobacter inf
- Page 166 and 167:
year demonstrated that only the num
- Page 168 and 169:
Table A3.1 Reported epidemiological
- Page 170 and 171:
Table A3.3 Selected reported risk f
- Page 172 and 173:
Table A3.5. The effect of various r
- Page 174 and 175:
Deming, M. S., Tauxe, R. V., Blake,
- Page 176 and 177:
Harris, N. V., Weiss, N. S., & Nola
- Page 178 and 179:
Kist, M. & Rossner, R. 1985a, in Ca
- Page 180 and 181:
Oosterom, J., den Uyl, C. H., Banff
- Page 182 and 183:
Severin, W. P. J. 1982, "Epidemiolo
- Page 184 and 185:
Appendix 4. The Campylobacter Senti
- Page 186 and 187:
185
- Page 188 and 189:
187